From 4a410c3ccf0f616d3d2df7a3705989c631fbdbc1 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Hyunwoo Kim Date: Sat, 9 Dec 2023 05:55:18 -0500 Subject: [PATCH 1/4] Bluetooth: af_bluetooth: Fix Use-After-Free in bt_sock_recvmsg mainline inclusion from mainline-v6.7-rc7~21^2~8^2 commit 2e07e8348ea454615e268222ae3fc240421be768 category: bugfix issue: #I8T1LS CVE: CVE-2023-51779 Signed-off-by: yaowenrui --------------------------------------- This can cause a race with bt_sock_ioctl() because bt_sock_recvmsg() gets the skb from sk->sk_receive_queue and then frees it without holding lock_sock. A use-after-free for a skb occurs with the following flow. ``` bt_sock_recvmsg() -> skb_recv_datagram() -> skb_free_datagram() bt_sock_ioctl() -> skb_peek() ``` Add lock_sock to bt_sock_recvmsg() to fix this issue. Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org Fixes: 1da177e4c3f4 ("Linux-2.6.12-rc2") Signed-off-by: Hyunwoo Kim Signed-off-by: Luiz Augusto von Dentz --- net/bluetooth/af_bluetooth.c | 7 ++++++- 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/net/bluetooth/af_bluetooth.c b/net/bluetooth/af_bluetooth.c index 2f87f57e7a4f..14a917e70f3e 100644 --- a/net/bluetooth/af_bluetooth.c +++ b/net/bluetooth/af_bluetooth.c @@ -263,11 +263,14 @@ int bt_sock_recvmsg(struct socket *sock, struct msghdr *msg, size_t len, if (flags & MSG_OOB) return -EOPNOTSUPP; + lock_sock(sk); + skb = skb_recv_datagram(sk, flags, noblock, &err); if (!skb) { if (sk->sk_shutdown & RCV_SHUTDOWN) - return 0; + err = 0; + release_sock(sk); return err; } @@ -293,6 +296,8 @@ int bt_sock_recvmsg(struct socket *sock, struct msghdr *msg, size_t len, skb_free_datagram(sk, skb); + release_sock(sk); + if (flags & MSG_TRUNC) copied = skblen; -- Gitee From c56cce8f30f9c6618789769e493bcb5bdde985ee Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Hyunwoo Kim Date: Sat, 9 Dec 2023 04:42:10 -0500 Subject: [PATCH 2/4] atm: Fix Use-After-Free in do_vcc_ioctl stable inclusion from stable-v5.10.205~49 commit 64a032015c336ca1795b3e1b1d1f94085ada3553 category: bugfix issue: NA CVE: CVE-2023-51780 Signed-off-by: yaowenrui --------------------------------------- [ Upstream commit 24e90b9e34f9e039f56b5f25f6e6eb92cdd8f4b3 ] Because do_vcc_ioctl() accesses sk->sk_receive_queue without holding a sk->sk_receive_queue.lock, it can cause a race with vcc_recvmsg(). A use-after-free for skb occurs with the following flow. ``` do_vcc_ioctl() -> skb_peek() vcc_recvmsg() -> skb_recv_datagram() -> skb_free_datagram() ``` Add sk->sk_receive_queue.lock to do_vcc_ioctl() to fix this issue. Fixes: 1da177e4c3f4 ("Linux-2.6.12-rc2") Signed-off-by: Hyunwoo Kim Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231209094210.GA403126@v4bel-B760M-AORUS-ELITE-AX Signed-off-by: Paolo Abeni Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin --- net/atm/ioctl.c | 7 +++++-- 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/net/atm/ioctl.c b/net/atm/ioctl.c index 838ebf0cabbf..f81f8d56f5c0 100644 --- a/net/atm/ioctl.c +++ b/net/atm/ioctl.c @@ -73,14 +73,17 @@ static int do_vcc_ioctl(struct socket *sock, unsigned int cmd, case SIOCINQ: { struct sk_buff *skb; + int amount; if (sock->state != SS_CONNECTED) { error = -EINVAL; goto done; } + spin_lock_irq(&sk->sk_receive_queue.lock); skb = skb_peek(&sk->sk_receive_queue); - error = put_user(skb ? skb->len : 0, - (int __user *)argp) ? -EFAULT : 0; + amount = skb ? skb->len : 0; + spin_unlock_irq(&sk->sk_receive_queue.lock); + error = put_user(amount, (int __user *)argp) ? -EFAULT : 0; goto done; } case ATM_SETSC: -- Gitee From 5351eebc063c7aa58d007ca38fb0365c2c97a34f Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Hyunwoo Kim Date: Tue, 12 Dec 2023 23:10:56 -0500 Subject: [PATCH 3/4] appletalk: Fix Use-After-Free in atalk_ioctl stable inclusion from stable-v5.10.205~39 commit a232eb81c7cb5d4dbd325d4611ed029b7fa07596 category: bugfix issue: NA CVE: CVE-2023-51781 Signed-off-by: yaowenrui --------------------------------------- [ Upstream commit 189ff16722ee36ced4d2a2469d4ab65a8fee4198 ] Because atalk_ioctl() accesses sk->sk_receive_queue without holding a sk->sk_receive_queue.lock, it can cause a race with atalk_recvmsg(). A use-after-free for skb occurs with the following flow. ``` atalk_ioctl() -> skb_peek() atalk_recvmsg() -> skb_recv_datagram() -> skb_free_datagram() ``` Add sk->sk_receive_queue.lock to atalk_ioctl() to fix this issue. Fixes: 1da177e4c3f4 ("Linux-2.6.12-rc2") Signed-off-by: Hyunwoo Kim Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231213041056.GA519680@v4bel-B760M-AORUS-ELITE-AX Signed-off-by: Paolo Abeni Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin --- net/appletalk/ddp.c | 9 ++++----- 1 file changed, 4 insertions(+), 5 deletions(-) diff --git a/net/appletalk/ddp.c b/net/appletalk/ddp.c index c94b212d8e7c..46adb8cefccf 100644 --- a/net/appletalk/ddp.c +++ b/net/appletalk/ddp.c @@ -1811,15 +1811,14 @@ static int atalk_ioctl(struct socket *sock, unsigned int cmd, unsigned long arg) break; } case TIOCINQ: { - /* - * These two are safe on a single CPU system as only - * user tasks fiddle here - */ - struct sk_buff *skb = skb_peek(&sk->sk_receive_queue); + struct sk_buff *skb; long amount = 0; + spin_lock_irq(&sk->sk_receive_queue.lock); + skb = skb_peek(&sk->sk_receive_queue); if (skb) amount = skb->len - sizeof(struct ddpehdr); + spin_unlock_irq(&sk->sk_receive_queue.lock); rc = put_user(amount, (int __user *)argp); break; } -- Gitee From 87285cfe3cc11d072748b1773976503176338fb9 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Hyunwoo Kim Date: Sat, 9 Dec 2023 05:05:38 -0500 Subject: [PATCH 4/4] net/rose: Fix Use-After-Free in rose_ioctl stable inclusion from stable-v5.10.205~48 commit 7eda5960a5332654b10d951e735750ed60d7f0a9 category: bugfix issue: NA CVE: CVE-2023-51782 Signed-off-by: yaowenrui --------------------------------------- [ Upstream commit 810c38a369a0a0ce625b5c12169abce1dd9ccd53 ] Because rose_ioctl() accesses sk->sk_receive_queue without holding a sk->sk_receive_queue.lock, it can cause a race with rose_accept(). A use-after-free for skb occurs with the following flow. ``` rose_ioctl() -> skb_peek() rose_accept() -> skb_dequeue() -> kfree_skb() ``` Add sk->sk_receive_queue.lock to rose_ioctl() to fix this issue. Fixes: 1da177e4c3f4 ("Linux-2.6.12-rc2") Signed-off-by: Hyunwoo Kim Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20231209100538.GA407321@v4bel-B760M-AORUS-ELITE-AX Signed-off-by: Paolo Abeni Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin --- net/rose/af_rose.c | 4 +++- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/net/rose/af_rose.c b/net/rose/af_rose.c index 86c93cf1744b..b3e7a92f1ec1 100644 --- a/net/rose/af_rose.c +++ b/net/rose/af_rose.c @@ -1307,9 +1307,11 @@ static int rose_ioctl(struct socket *sock, unsigned int cmd, unsigned long arg) case TIOCINQ: { struct sk_buff *skb; long amount = 0L; - /* These two are safe on a single CPU system as only user tasks fiddle here */ + + spin_lock_irq(&sk->sk_receive_queue.lock); if ((skb = skb_peek(&sk->sk_receive_queue)) != NULL) amount = skb->len; + spin_unlock_irq(&sk->sk_receive_queue.lock); return put_user(amount, (unsigned int __user *) argp); } -- Gitee