From e83cf3ba167e23c8375b98bd31f183484bebfaca Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Lin Ma Date: Fri, 17 Dec 2021 10:29:41 +0800 Subject: [PATCH 1/6] ax25: NPD bug when detaching AX25 device stable inclusion from stable-5.10.89 commit 8e34d07dd4d9f7811d8ae35adee24e78a4576844 category: bugfix issue: I57ESG CVE: CVE-2022-1199 Signed-off-by: gaochao --------------------------------------- ax25: NPD bug when detaching AX25 device commit 1ade48d0c27d5da1ccf4b583d8c5fc8b534a3ac8 upstream. The existing cleanup routine implementation is not well synchronized with the syscall routine. When a device is detaching, below race could occur. static int ax25_sendmsg(...) { ... lock_sock() ax25 = sk_to_ax25(sk); if (ax25->ax25_dev == NULL) // CHECK ... ax25_queue_xmit(skb, ax25->ax25_dev->dev); // USE ... } static void ax25_kill_by_device(...) { ... if (s->ax25_dev == ax25_dev) { s->ax25_dev = NULL; ... } Other syscall functions like ax25_getsockopt, ax25_getname, ax25_info_show also suffer from similar races. To fix them, this patch introduce lock_sock() into ax25_kill_by_device in order to guarantee that the nullify action in cleanup routine cannot proceed when another socket request is pending. Signed-off-by: Hanjie Wu Signed-off-by: Lin Ma Signed-off-by: David S. Miller Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman --- net/ax25/af_ax25.c | 4 +++- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/net/ax25/af_ax25.c b/net/ax25/af_ax25.c index 269ee89d2c2b..22278807b3f3 100644 --- a/net/ax25/af_ax25.c +++ b/net/ax25/af_ax25.c @@ -85,8 +85,10 @@ static void ax25_kill_by_device(struct net_device *dev) again: ax25_for_each(s, &ax25_list) { if (s->ax25_dev == ax25_dev) { - s->ax25_dev = NULL; spin_unlock_bh(&ax25_list_lock); + lock_sock(s->sk); + s->ax25_dev = NULL; + release_sock(s->sk); ax25_disconnect(s, ENETUNREACH); spin_lock_bh(&ax25_list_lock); -- Gitee From 5cde52bcc6bb95055b06e50a67286695f5042668 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Duoming Zhou Date: Fri, 28 Jan 2022 12:47:15 +0800 Subject: [PATCH 2/6] ax25: improve the incomplete fix to avoid UAF and NPD bugs stable inclusion from stable-5.10.102 commit b9a229fd48bfa45edb954c75a57e3931a3da6c5f category: bugfix issue: I57ESG CVE: CVE-2022-1199 Signed-off-by: gaochao --------------------------------------- ax25: improve the incomplete fix to avoid UAF and NPD bugs [ Upstream commit 4e0f718daf97d47cf7dec122da1be970f145c809 ] The previous commit 1ade48d0c27d ("ax25: NPD bug when detaching AX25 device") introduce lock_sock() into ax25_kill_by_device to prevent NPD bug. But the concurrency NPD or UAF bug will occur, when lock_sock() or release_sock() dereferences the ax25_cb->sock. The NULL pointer dereference bug can be shown as below: ax25_kill_by_device() | ax25_release() | ax25_destroy_socket() | ax25_cb_del() ... | ... | ax25->sk=NULL; lock_sock(s->sk); //(1) | s->ax25_dev = NULL; | ... release_sock(s->sk); //(2) | ... | The root cause is that the sock is set to null before dereference site (1) or (2). Therefore, this patch extracts the ax25_cb->sock in advance, and uses ax25_list_lock to protect it, which can synchronize with ax25_cb_del() and ensure the value of sock is not null before dereference sites. The concurrency UAF bug can be shown as below: ax25_kill_by_device() | ax25_release() | ax25_destroy_socket() ... | ... | sock_put(sk); //FREE lock_sock(s->sk); //(1) | s->ax25_dev = NULL; | ... release_sock(s->sk); //(2) | ... | The root cause is that the sock is released before dereference site (1) or (2). Therefore, this patch uses sock_hold() to increase the refcount of sock and uses ax25_list_lock to protect it, which can synchronize with ax25_cb_del() in ax25_destroy_socket() and ensure the sock wil not be released before dereference sites. Signed-off-by: Duoming Zhou Signed-off-by: David S. Miller Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin --- net/ax25/af_ax25.c | 9 ++++++--- 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/net/ax25/af_ax25.c b/net/ax25/af_ax25.c index 22278807b3f3..cbedc33f8b27 100644 --- a/net/ax25/af_ax25.c +++ b/net/ax25/af_ax25.c @@ -77,6 +77,7 @@ static void ax25_kill_by_device(struct net_device *dev) { ax25_dev *ax25_dev; ax25_cb *s; + struct sock *sk; if ((ax25_dev = ax25_dev_ax25dev(dev)) == NULL) return; @@ -85,13 +86,15 @@ static void ax25_kill_by_device(struct net_device *dev) again: ax25_for_each(s, &ax25_list) { if (s->ax25_dev == ax25_dev) { + sk = s->sk; + sock_hold(sk); spin_unlock_bh(&ax25_list_lock); - lock_sock(s->sk); + lock_sock(sk); s->ax25_dev = NULL; - release_sock(s->sk); + release_sock(sk); ax25_disconnect(s, ENETUNREACH); spin_lock_bh(&ax25_list_lock); - + sock_put(sk); /* The entry could have been deleted from the * list meanwhile and thus the next pointer is * no longer valid. Play it safe and restart -- Gitee From eb70a8ce64865beadd8809e61dc433442b2e8341 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Duoming Zhou Date: Tue, 8 Mar 2022 16:12:23 +0800 Subject: [PATCH 3/6] ax25: Fix NULL pointer dereference in ax25_kill_by_device stable inclusion from stable-5.10.106 commit e2201ef32f933944ee02e59205adb566bafcdf91 category: bugfix issue: I57ESG CVE: CVE-2022-1199 Signed-off-by: gaochao --------------------------------------- ax25: Fix NULL pointer dereference in ax25_kill_by_device [ Upstream commit 71171ac8eb34ce7fe6b3267dce27c313ab3cb3ac ] When two ax25 devices attempted to establish connection, the requester use ax25_create(), ax25_bind() and ax25_connect() to initiate connection. The receiver use ax25_rcv() to accept connection and use ax25_create_cb() in ax25_rcv() to create ax25_cb, but the ax25_cb->sk is NULL. When the receiver is detaching, a NULL pointer dereference bug caused by sock_hold(sk) in ax25_kill_by_device() will happen. The corresponding fail log is shown below: =============================================================== BUG: KASAN: null-ptr-deref in ax25_device_event+0xfd/0x290 Call Trace: ... ax25_device_event+0xfd/0x290 raw_notifier_call_chain+0x5e/0x70 dev_close_many+0x174/0x220 unregister_netdevice_many+0x1f7/0xa60 unregister_netdevice_queue+0x12f/0x170 unregister_netdev+0x13/0x20 mkiss_close+0xcd/0x140 tty_ldisc_release+0xc0/0x220 tty_release_struct+0x17/0xa0 tty_release+0x62d/0x670 ... This patch add condition check in ax25_kill_by_device(). If s->sk is NULL, it will goto if branch to kill device. Fixes: 4e0f718daf97 ("ax25: improve the incomplete fix to avoid UAF and NPD bugs") Reported-by: Thomas Osterried Signed-off-by: Duoming Zhou Signed-off-by: David S. Miller Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin --- net/ax25/af_ax25.c | 7 +++++++ 1 file changed, 7 insertions(+) diff --git a/net/ax25/af_ax25.c b/net/ax25/af_ax25.c index cbedc33f8b27..e5f6838a235a 100644 --- a/net/ax25/af_ax25.c +++ b/net/ax25/af_ax25.c @@ -87,6 +87,13 @@ static void ax25_kill_by_device(struct net_device *dev) ax25_for_each(s, &ax25_list) { if (s->ax25_dev == ax25_dev) { sk = s->sk; + if (!sk) { + spin_unlock_bh(&ax25_list_lock); + s->ax25_dev = NULL; + ax25_disconnect(s, ENETUNREACH); + spin_lock_bh(&ax25_list_lock); + goto again; + } sock_hold(sk); spin_unlock_bh(&ax25_list_lock); lock_sock(sk); -- Gitee From bdba6d020784259d2a18b7ff6a4c25ba617d8f4e Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Duoming Zhou Date: Fri, 15 Apr 2022 20:49:31 +0300 Subject: [PATCH 4/6] ax25: fix NPD bug in ax25_disconnect stable inclusion from stable-5.10.112 commit 145ea8d213e8f46667cd904ae79d17f298750f00 category: bugfix issue: I57ESG CVE: CVE-2022-1199 Signed-off-by: gaochao --------------------------------------- ax25: fix NPD bug in ax25_disconnect commit 7ec02f5ac8a5be5a3f20611731243dc5e1d9ba10 upstream. The ax25_disconnect() in ax25_kill_by_device() is not protected by any locks, thus there is a race condition between ax25_disconnect() and ax25_destroy_socket(). when ax25->sk is assigned as NULL by ax25_destroy_socket(), a NULL pointer dereference bug will occur if site (1) or (2) dereferences ax25->sk. ax25_kill_by_device() | ax25_release() ax25_disconnect() | ax25_destroy_socket() ... | if(ax25->sk != NULL) | ... ... | ax25->sk = NULL; bh_lock_sock(ax25->sk); //(1) | ... ... | bh_unlock_sock(ax25->sk); //(2)| This patch moves ax25_disconnect() into lock_sock(), which can synchronize with ax25_destroy_socket() in ax25_release(). Fail log: =============================================================== BUG: kernel NULL pointer dereference, address: 0000000000000088 ... RIP: 0010:_raw_spin_lock+0x7e/0xd0 ... Call Trace: ax25_disconnect+0xf6/0x220 ax25_device_event+0x187/0x250 raw_notifier_call_chain+0x5e/0x70 dev_close_many+0x17d/0x230 rollback_registered_many+0x1f1/0x950 unregister_netdevice_queue+0x133/0x200 unregister_netdev+0x13/0x20 ... Signed-off-by: Duoming Zhou Signed-off-by: David S. Miller [OP: backport to 5.10: adjust context] Signed-off-by: Ovidiu Panait Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman --- net/ax25/af_ax25.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/net/ax25/af_ax25.c b/net/ax25/af_ax25.c index e5f6838a235a..4100aec3017d 100644 --- a/net/ax25/af_ax25.c +++ b/net/ax25/af_ax25.c @@ -98,8 +98,8 @@ static void ax25_kill_by_device(struct net_device *dev) spin_unlock_bh(&ax25_list_lock); lock_sock(sk); s->ax25_dev = NULL; - release_sock(sk); ax25_disconnect(s, ENETUNREACH); + release_sock(sk); spin_lock_bh(&ax25_list_lock); sock_put(sk); /* The entry could have been deleted from the -- Gitee From a96ae84f2bd78dd96b7093138bf753fe6e1194a9 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Duoming Zhou Date: Fri, 29 Apr 2022 20:45:51 +0800 Subject: [PATCH 5/6] nfc: nfcmrvl: main: reorder destructive operations in nfcmrvl_nci_unregister_dev to avoid bugs stable inclusion from stable-5.10.115 commit 1961c5a688edb53fe3bc25cbda57f47adf12563c category: bugfix issue: I57ESG CVE: CVE-2022-1734 Signed-off-by: gaochao --------------------------------------- nfc: nfcmrvl: main: reorder destructive operations in nfcmrvl_nci_unregister_dev to avoid bugs commit d270453a0d9ec10bb8a802a142fb1b3601a83098 upstream. There are destructive operations such as nfcmrvl_fw_dnld_abort and gpio_free in nfcmrvl_nci_unregister_dev. The resources such as firmware, gpio and so on could be destructed while the upper layer functions such as nfcmrvl_fw_dnld_start and nfcmrvl_nci_recv_frame is executing, which leads to double-free, use-after-free and null-ptr-deref bugs. There are three situations that could lead to double-free bugs. The first situation is shown below: (Thread 1) | (Thread 2) nfcmrvl_fw_dnld_start | ... | nfcmrvl_nci_unregister_dev release_firmware() | nfcmrvl_fw_dnld_abort kfree(fw) //(1) | fw_dnld_over | release_firmware ... | kfree(fw) //(2) | ... The second situation is shown below: (Thread 1) | (Thread 2) nfcmrvl_fw_dnld_start | ... | mod_timer | (wait a time) | fw_dnld_timeout | nfcmrvl_nci_unregister_dev fw_dnld_over | nfcmrvl_fw_dnld_abort release_firmware | fw_dnld_over kfree(fw) //(1) | release_firmware ... | kfree(fw) //(2) The third situation is shown below: (Thread 1) | (Thread 2) nfcmrvl_nci_recv_frame | if(..->fw_download_in_progress)| nfcmrvl_fw_dnld_recv_frame | queue_work | | fw_dnld_rx_work | nfcmrvl_nci_unregister_dev fw_dnld_over | nfcmrvl_fw_dnld_abort release_firmware | fw_dnld_over kfree(fw) //(1) | release_firmware | kfree(fw) //(2) The firmware struct is deallocated in position (1) and deallocated in position (2) again. The crash trace triggered by POC is like below: BUG: KASAN: double-free or invalid-free in fw_dnld_over Call Trace: kfree fw_dnld_over nfcmrvl_nci_unregister_dev nci_uart_tty_close tty_ldisc_kill tty_ldisc_hangup __tty_hangup.part.0 tty_release ... What's more, there are also use-after-free and null-ptr-deref bugs in nfcmrvl_fw_dnld_start. If we deallocate firmware struct, gpio or set null to the members of priv->fw_dnld in nfcmrvl_nci_unregister_dev, then, we dereference firmware, gpio or the members of priv->fw_dnld in nfcmrvl_fw_dnld_start, the UAF or NPD bugs will happen. This patch reorders destructive operations after nci_unregister_device in order to synchronize between cleanup routine and firmware download routine. The nci_unregister_device is well synchronized. If the device is detaching, the firmware download routine will goto error. If firmware download routine is executing, nci_unregister_device will wait until firmware download routine is finished. Fixes: 3194c6870158 ("NFC: nfcmrvl: add firmware download support") Signed-off-by: Duoming Zhou Signed-off-by: David S. Miller Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman --- drivers/nfc/nfcmrvl/main.c | 2 +- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/drivers/nfc/nfcmrvl/main.c b/drivers/nfc/nfcmrvl/main.c index 529be35ac178..54d228acc0f5 100644 --- a/drivers/nfc/nfcmrvl/main.c +++ b/drivers/nfc/nfcmrvl/main.c @@ -194,6 +194,7 @@ void nfcmrvl_nci_unregister_dev(struct nfcmrvl_private *priv) { struct nci_dev *ndev = priv->ndev; + nci_unregister_device(ndev); if (priv->ndev->nfc_dev->fw_download_in_progress) nfcmrvl_fw_dnld_abort(priv); @@ -202,7 +203,6 @@ void nfcmrvl_nci_unregister_dev(struct nfcmrvl_private *priv) if (gpio_is_valid(priv->config.reset_n_io)) gpio_free(priv->config.reset_n_io); - nci_unregister_device(ndev); nci_free_device(ndev); kfree(priv); } -- Gitee From e9cab1aca5a41aff059c71576737824740378670 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Duoming Zhou Date: Tue, 14 Jun 2022 16:23:14 +0800 Subject: [PATCH 6/6] nfc: replace improper check device_is_registered() in netlink related functions stable inclusion from stable-v5.10.115 category: bugfix bugzilla: https://gitee.com/src-openeuler/kernel/issues/I5B79D CVE: CVE-2022-1974 Signed-off-by: Fang Minjuan ------------------------------- Reference: https://git.kernel.org/pub/scm/linux/kernel/git/stable/linux.git/commit/?id=8a9e7c64f4a02c4c397e55ba379609168ec7df4a -------------------------------- commit da5c0f119203ad9728920456a0f52a6d850c01cd upstream. The device_is_registered() in nfc core is used to check whether nfc device is registered in netlink related functions such as nfc_fw_download(), nfc_dev_up() and so on. Although device_is_registered() is protected by device_lock, there is still a race condition between device_del() and device_is_registered(). The root cause is that kobject_del() in device_del() is not protected by device_lock. (cleanup task) | (netlink task) | nfc_unregister_device | nfc_fw_download device_del | device_lock ... | if (!device_is_registered)//(1) kobject_del//(2) | ... ... | device_unlock The device_is_registered() returns the value of state_in_sysfs and the state_in_sysfs is set to zero in kobject_del(). If we pass check in position (1), then set zero in position (2). As a result, the check in position (1) is useless. This patch uses bool variable instead of device_is_registered() to judge whether the nfc device is registered, which is well synchronized. Fixes: 3e256b8f8dfa ("NFC: add nfc subsystem core") Signed-off-by: Duoming Zhou Signed-off-by: David S. Miller Signed-off-by: Baisong Zhong Reviewed-by: Xiu Jianfeng Reviewed-by: Wei Yongjun Signed-off-by: Zheng Zengkai --- net/nfc/core.c | 29 ++++++++++++++--------------- 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-) diff --git a/net/nfc/core.c b/net/nfc/core.c index 6800470dd6df..3b2983813ff1 100644 --- a/net/nfc/core.c +++ b/net/nfc/core.c @@ -38,7 +38,7 @@ int nfc_fw_download(struct nfc_dev *dev, const char *firmware_name) device_lock(&dev->dev); - if (!device_is_registered(&dev->dev)) { + if (dev->shutting_down) { rc = -ENODEV; goto error; } @@ -94,7 +94,7 @@ int nfc_dev_up(struct nfc_dev *dev) device_lock(&dev->dev); - if (!device_is_registered(&dev->dev)) { + if (dev->shutting_down) { rc = -ENODEV; goto error; } @@ -142,7 +142,7 @@ int nfc_dev_down(struct nfc_dev *dev) device_lock(&dev->dev); - if (!device_is_registered(&dev->dev)) { + if (dev->shutting_down) { rc = -ENODEV; goto error; } @@ -206,7 +206,7 @@ int nfc_start_poll(struct nfc_dev *dev, u32 im_protocols, u32 tm_protocols) device_lock(&dev->dev); - if (!device_is_registered(&dev->dev)) { + if (dev->shutting_down) { rc = -ENODEV; goto error; } @@ -245,7 +245,7 @@ int nfc_stop_poll(struct nfc_dev *dev) device_lock(&dev->dev); - if (!device_is_registered(&dev->dev)) { + if (dev->shutting_down) { rc = -ENODEV; goto error; } @@ -290,7 +290,7 @@ int nfc_dep_link_up(struct nfc_dev *dev, int target_index, u8 comm_mode) device_lock(&dev->dev); - if (!device_is_registered(&dev->dev)) { + if (dev->shutting_down) { rc = -ENODEV; goto error; } @@ -334,7 +334,7 @@ int nfc_dep_link_down(struct nfc_dev *dev) device_lock(&dev->dev); - if (!device_is_registered(&dev->dev)) { + if (dev->shutting_down) { rc = -ENODEV; goto error; } @@ -400,7 +400,7 @@ int nfc_activate_target(struct nfc_dev *dev, u32 target_idx, u32 protocol) device_lock(&dev->dev); - if (!device_is_registered(&dev->dev)) { + if (dev->shutting_down) { rc = -ENODEV; goto error; } @@ -446,7 +446,7 @@ int nfc_deactivate_target(struct nfc_dev *dev, u32 target_idx, u8 mode) device_lock(&dev->dev); - if (!device_is_registered(&dev->dev)) { + if (dev->shutting_down) { rc = -ENODEV; goto error; } @@ -493,7 +493,7 @@ int nfc_data_exchange(struct nfc_dev *dev, u32 target_idx, struct sk_buff *skb, device_lock(&dev->dev); - if (!device_is_registered(&dev->dev)) { + if (dev->shutting_down) { rc = -ENODEV; kfree_skb(skb); goto error; @@ -550,7 +550,7 @@ int nfc_enable_se(struct nfc_dev *dev, u32 se_idx) device_lock(&dev->dev); - if (!device_is_registered(&dev->dev)) { + if (dev->shutting_down) { rc = -ENODEV; goto error; } @@ -599,7 +599,7 @@ int nfc_disable_se(struct nfc_dev *dev, u32 se_idx) device_lock(&dev->dev); - if (!device_is_registered(&dev->dev)) { + if (dev->shutting_down) { rc = -ENODEV; goto error; } @@ -1126,6 +1126,7 @@ int nfc_register_device(struct nfc_dev *dev) dev->rfkill = NULL; } } + dev->shutting_down = false; device_unlock(&dev->dev); rc = nfc_genl_device_added(dev); @@ -1158,12 +1159,10 @@ void nfc_unregister_device(struct nfc_dev *dev) rfkill_unregister(dev->rfkill); rfkill_destroy(dev->rfkill); } + dev->shutting_down = true; device_unlock(&dev->dev); if (dev->ops->check_presence) { - device_lock(&dev->dev); - dev->shutting_down = true; - device_unlock(&dev->dev); del_timer_sync(&dev->check_pres_timer); cancel_work_sync(&dev->check_pres_work); } -- Gitee