From 2045a3e40b63d5bcdea213b9f567dfed5804153c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Pawan Gupta Date: Thu, 19 May 2022 20:26:07 -0700 Subject: [PATCH 01/10] Documentation: Add documentation for Processor MMIO Stale Data stable inclusion from stable-5.10.123 commit f8a85334a57e7842320476ff27be3a5f151da364 category: bugfix issue: I5HNPE CVE: CVE-2022-21123,CVE-2022-21125,CVE-2022-21166 Signed-off-by: gaochao --------------------------------------- Documentation: Add documentation for Processor MMIO Stale Data commit 4419470191386456e0b8ed4eb06a70b0021798a6 upstream Add the admin guide for Processor MMIO stale data vulnerabilities. Signed-off-by: Pawan Gupta Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman --- Documentation/admin-guide/hw-vuln/index.rst | 1 + .../hw-vuln/processor_mmio_stale_data.rst | 246 ++++++++++++++++++ 2 files changed, 247 insertions(+) create mode 100644 Documentation/admin-guide/hw-vuln/processor_mmio_stale_data.rst diff --git a/Documentation/admin-guide/hw-vuln/index.rst b/Documentation/admin-guide/hw-vuln/index.rst index ca4dbdd9016d..2adec1e6520a 100644 --- a/Documentation/admin-guide/hw-vuln/index.rst +++ b/Documentation/admin-guide/hw-vuln/index.rst @@ -15,3 +15,4 @@ are configurable at compile, boot or run time. tsx_async_abort multihit.rst special-register-buffer-data-sampling.rst + processor_mmio_stale_data.rst diff --git a/Documentation/admin-guide/hw-vuln/processor_mmio_stale_data.rst b/Documentation/admin-guide/hw-vuln/processor_mmio_stale_data.rst new file mode 100644 index 000000000000..9393c50b5afc --- /dev/null +++ b/Documentation/admin-guide/hw-vuln/processor_mmio_stale_data.rst @@ -0,0 +1,246 @@ +========================================= +Processor MMIO Stale Data Vulnerabilities +========================================= + +Processor MMIO Stale Data Vulnerabilities are a class of memory-mapped I/O +(MMIO) vulnerabilities that can expose data. The sequences of operations for +exposing data range from simple to very complex. Because most of the +vulnerabilities require the attacker to have access to MMIO, many environments +are not affected. System environments using virtualization where MMIO access is +provided to untrusted guests may need mitigation. These vulnerabilities are +not transient execution attacks. However, these vulnerabilities may propagate +stale data into core fill buffers where the data can subsequently be inferred +by an unmitigated transient execution attack. Mitigation for these +vulnerabilities includes a combination of microcode update and software +changes, depending on the platform and usage model. Some of these mitigations +are similar to those used to mitigate Microarchitectural Data Sampling (MDS) or +those used to mitigate Special Register Buffer Data Sampling (SRBDS). + +Data Propagators +================ +Propagators are operations that result in stale data being copied or moved from +one microarchitectural buffer or register to another. Processor MMIO Stale Data +Vulnerabilities are operations that may result in stale data being directly +read into an architectural, software-visible state or sampled from a buffer or +register. + +Fill Buffer Stale Data Propagator (FBSDP) +----------------------------------------- +Stale data may propagate from fill buffers (FB) into the non-coherent portion +of the uncore on some non-coherent writes. Fill buffer propagation by itself +does not make stale data architecturally visible. Stale data must be propagated +to a location where it is subject to reading or sampling. + +Sideband Stale Data Propagator (SSDP) +------------------------------------- +The sideband stale data propagator (SSDP) is limited to the client (including +Intel Xeon server E3) uncore implementation. The sideband response buffer is +shared by all client cores. For non-coherent reads that go to sideband +destinations, the uncore logic returns 64 bytes of data to the core, including +both requested data and unrequested stale data, from a transaction buffer and +the sideband response buffer. As a result, stale data from the sideband +response and transaction buffers may now reside in a core fill buffer. + +Primary Stale Data Propagator (PSDP) +------------------------------------ +The primary stale data propagator (PSDP) is limited to the client (including +Intel Xeon server E3) uncore implementation. Similar to the sideband response +buffer, the primary response buffer is shared by all client cores. For some +processors, MMIO primary reads will return 64 bytes of data to the core fill +buffer including both requested data and unrequested stale data. This is +similar to the sideband stale data propagator. + +Vulnerabilities +=============== +Device Register Partial Write (DRPW) (CVE-2022-21166) +----------------------------------------------------- +Some endpoint MMIO registers incorrectly handle writes that are smaller than +the register size. Instead of aborting the write or only copying the correct +subset of bytes (for example, 2 bytes for a 2-byte write), more bytes than +specified by the write transaction may be written to the register. On +processors affected by FBSDP, this may expose stale data from the fill buffers +of the core that created the write transaction. + +Shared Buffers Data Sampling (SBDS) (CVE-2022-21125) +---------------------------------------------------- +After propagators may have moved data around the uncore and copied stale data +into client core fill buffers, processors affected by MFBDS can leak data from +the fill buffer. It is limited to the client (including Intel Xeon server E3) +uncore implementation. + +Shared Buffers Data Read (SBDR) (CVE-2022-21123) +------------------------------------------------ +It is similar to Shared Buffer Data Sampling (SBDS) except that the data is +directly read into the architectural software-visible state. It is limited to +the client (including Intel Xeon server E3) uncore implementation. + +Affected Processors +=================== +Not all the CPUs are affected by all the variants. For instance, most +processors for the server market (excluding Intel Xeon E3 processors) are +impacted by only Device Register Partial Write (DRPW). + +Below is the list of affected Intel processors [#f1]_: + + =================== ============ ========= + Common name Family_Model Steppings + =================== ============ ========= + HASWELL_X 06_3FH 2,4 + SKYLAKE_L 06_4EH 3 + BROADWELL_X 06_4FH All + SKYLAKE_X 06_55H 3,4,6,7,11 + BROADWELL_D 06_56H 3,4,5 + SKYLAKE 06_5EH 3 + ICELAKE_X 06_6AH 4,5,6 + ICELAKE_D 06_6CH 1 + ICELAKE_L 06_7EH 5 + ATOM_TREMONT_D 06_86H All + LAKEFIELD 06_8AH 1 + KABYLAKE_L 06_8EH 9 to 12 + ATOM_TREMONT 06_96H 1 + ATOM_TREMONT_L 06_9CH 0 + KABYLAKE 06_9EH 9 to 13 + COMETLAKE 06_A5H 2,3,5 + COMETLAKE_L 06_A6H 0,1 + ROCKETLAKE 06_A7H 1 + =================== ============ ========= + +If a CPU is in the affected processor list, but not affected by a variant, it +is indicated by new bits in MSR IA32_ARCH_CAPABILITIES. As described in a later +section, mitigation largely remains the same for all the variants, i.e. to +clear the CPU fill buffers via VERW instruction. + +New bits in MSRs +================ +Newer processors and microcode update on existing affected processors added new +bits to IA32_ARCH_CAPABILITIES MSR. These bits can be used to enumerate +specific variants of Processor MMIO Stale Data vulnerabilities and mitigation +capability. + +MSR IA32_ARCH_CAPABILITIES +-------------------------- +Bit 13 - SBDR_SSDP_NO - When set, processor is not affected by either the + Shared Buffers Data Read (SBDR) vulnerability or the sideband stale + data propagator (SSDP). +Bit 14 - FBSDP_NO - When set, processor is not affected by the Fill Buffer + Stale Data Propagator (FBSDP). +Bit 15 - PSDP_NO - When set, processor is not affected by Primary Stale Data + Propagator (PSDP). +Bit 17 - FB_CLEAR - When set, VERW instruction will overwrite CPU fill buffer + values as part of MD_CLEAR operations. Processors that do not + enumerate MDS_NO (meaning they are affected by MDS) but that do + enumerate support for both L1D_FLUSH and MD_CLEAR implicitly enumerate + FB_CLEAR as part of their MD_CLEAR support. +Bit 18 - FB_CLEAR_CTRL - Processor supports read and write to MSR + IA32_MCU_OPT_CTRL[FB_CLEAR_DIS]. On such processors, the FB_CLEAR_DIS + bit can be set to cause the VERW instruction to not perform the + FB_CLEAR action. Not all processors that support FB_CLEAR will support + FB_CLEAR_CTRL. + +MSR IA32_MCU_OPT_CTRL +--------------------- +Bit 3 - FB_CLEAR_DIS - When set, VERW instruction does not perform the FB_CLEAR +action. This may be useful to reduce the performance impact of FB_CLEAR in +cases where system software deems it warranted (for example, when performance +is more critical, or the untrusted software has no MMIO access). Note that +FB_CLEAR_DIS has no impact on enumeration (for example, it does not change +FB_CLEAR or MD_CLEAR enumeration) and it may not be supported on all processors +that enumerate FB_CLEAR. + +Mitigation +========== +Like MDS, all variants of Processor MMIO Stale Data vulnerabilities have the +same mitigation strategy to force the CPU to clear the affected buffers before +an attacker can extract the secrets. + +This is achieved by using the otherwise unused and obsolete VERW instruction in +combination with a microcode update. The microcode clears the affected CPU +buffers when the VERW instruction is executed. + +Kernel reuses the MDS function to invoke the buffer clearing: + + mds_clear_cpu_buffers() + +On MDS affected CPUs, the kernel already invokes CPU buffer clear on +kernel/userspace, hypervisor/guest and C-state (idle) transitions. No +additional mitigation is needed on such CPUs. + +For CPUs not affected by MDS or TAA, mitigation is needed only for the attacker +with MMIO capability. Therefore, VERW is not required for kernel/userspace. For +virtualization case, VERW is only needed at VMENTER for a guest with MMIO +capability. + +Mitigation points +----------------- +Return to user space +^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ +Same mitigation as MDS when affected by MDS/TAA, otherwise no mitigation +needed. + +C-State transition +^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ +Control register writes by CPU during C-state transition can propagate data +from fill buffer to uncore buffers. Execute VERW before C-state transition to +clear CPU fill buffers. + +Guest entry point +^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^ +Same mitigation as MDS when processor is also affected by MDS/TAA, otherwise +execute VERW at VMENTER only for MMIO capable guests. On CPUs not affected by +MDS/TAA, guest without MMIO access cannot extract secrets using Processor MMIO +Stale Data vulnerabilities, so there is no need to execute VERW for such guests. + +Mitigation control on the kernel command line +--------------------------------------------- +The kernel command line allows to control the Processor MMIO Stale Data +mitigations at boot time with the option "mmio_stale_data=". The valid +arguments for this option are: + + ========== ================================================================= + full If the CPU is vulnerable, enable mitigation; CPU buffer clearing + on exit to userspace and when entering a VM. Idle transitions are + protected as well. It does not automatically disable SMT. + full,nosmt Same as full, with SMT disabled on vulnerable CPUs. This is the + complete mitigation. + off Disables mitigation completely. + ========== ================================================================= + +If the CPU is affected and mmio_stale_data=off is not supplied on the kernel +command line, then the kernel selects the appropriate mitigation. + +Mitigation status information +----------------------------- +The Linux kernel provides a sysfs interface to enumerate the current +vulnerability status of the system: whether the system is vulnerable, and +which mitigations are active. The relevant sysfs file is: + + /sys/devices/system/cpu/vulnerabilities/mmio_stale_data + +The possible values in this file are: + + .. list-table:: + + * - 'Not affected' + - The processor is not vulnerable + * - 'Vulnerable' + - The processor is vulnerable, but no mitigation enabled + * - 'Vulnerable: Clear CPU buffers attempted, no microcode' + - The processor is vulnerable, but microcode is not updated. The + mitigation is enabled on a best effort basis. + * - 'Mitigation: Clear CPU buffers' + - The processor is vulnerable and the CPU buffer clearing mitigation is + enabled. + +If the processor is vulnerable then the following information is appended to +the above information: + + ======================== =========================================== + 'SMT vulnerable' SMT is enabled + 'SMT disabled' SMT is disabled + 'SMT Host state unknown' Kernel runs in a VM, Host SMT state unknown + ======================== =========================================== + +References +---------- +.. [#f1] Affected Processors + https://www.intel.com/content/www/us/en/developer/topic-technology/software-security-guidance/processors-affected-consolidated-product-cpu-model.html -- Gitee From 375b754ed9ee1eeae6248be992d382080ab8aef2 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Pawan Gupta Date: Thu, 19 May 2022 20:27:08 -0700 Subject: [PATCH 02/10] x86/speculation/mmio: Enumerate Processor MMIO Stale Data bug stable inclusion from stable-5.10.123 commit e66310bc96b74ed3df9993e5d835ef3084d62048 category: bugfix issue: I5HNPE CVE: CVE-2022-21123,CVE-2022-21125,CVE-2022-21166 Signed-off-by: gaochao --------------------------------------- x86/speculation/mmio: Enumerate Processor MMIO Stale Data bug commit 51802186158c74a0304f51ab963e7c2b3a2b046f upstream Processor MMIO Stale Data is a class of vulnerabilities that may expose data after an MMIO operation. For more details please refer to Documentation/admin-guide/hw-vuln/processor_mmio_stale_data.rst Add the Processor MMIO Stale Data bug enumeration. A microcode update adds new bits to the MSR IA32_ARCH_CAPABILITIES, define them. Signed-off-by: Pawan Gupta Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman --- arch/x86/include/asm/cpufeatures.h | 1 + arch/x86/include/asm/msr-index.h | 19 +++++++++++ arch/x86/kernel/cpu/common.c | 43 ++++++++++++++++++++++-- tools/arch/x86/include/asm/cpufeatures.h | 1 + tools/arch/x86/include/asm/msr-index.h | 19 +++++++++++ 5 files changed, 81 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/cpufeatures.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/cpufeatures.h index 3b407f46f1a0..f6a6ac0b3bcd 100644 --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/cpufeatures.h +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/cpufeatures.h @@ -417,5 +417,6 @@ #define X86_BUG_TAA X86_BUG(22) /* CPU is affected by TSX Async Abort(TAA) */ #define X86_BUG_ITLB_MULTIHIT X86_BUG(23) /* CPU may incur MCE during certain page attribute changes */ #define X86_BUG_SRBDS X86_BUG(24) /* CPU may leak RNG bits if not mitigated */ +#define X86_BUG_MMIO_STALE_DATA X86_BUG(25) /* CPU is affected by Processor MMIO Stale Data vulnerabilities */ #endif /* _ASM_X86_CPUFEATURES_H */ diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/msr-index.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/msr-index.h index 972a34d93505..37a7b1ec1ac0 100644 --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/msr-index.h +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/msr-index.h @@ -114,6 +114,25 @@ * Not susceptible to * TSX Async Abort (TAA) vulnerabilities. */ +#define ARCH_CAP_SBDR_SSDP_NO BIT(13) /* + * Not susceptible to SBDR and SSDP + * variants of Processor MMIO stale data + * vulnerabilities. + */ +#define ARCH_CAP_FBSDP_NO BIT(14) /* + * Not susceptible to FBSDP variant of + * Processor MMIO stale data + * vulnerabilities. + */ +#define ARCH_CAP_PSDP_NO BIT(15) /* + * Not susceptible to PSDP variant of + * Processor MMIO stale data + * vulnerabilities. + */ +#define ARCH_CAP_FB_CLEAR BIT(17) /* + * VERW clears CPU fill buffer + * even on MDS_NO CPUs. + */ #define MSR_IA32_FLUSH_CMD 0x0000010b #define L1D_FLUSH BIT(0) /* diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/common.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/common.c index 9c8fc6f513ed..d2e11cc5bd01 100644 --- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/common.c +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/common.c @@ -1098,18 +1098,39 @@ static const __initconst struct x86_cpu_id cpu_vuln_whitelist[] = { X86_FEATURE_ANY, issues) #define SRBDS BIT(0) +/* CPU is affected by X86_BUG_MMIO_STALE_DATA */ +#define MMIO BIT(1) static const struct x86_cpu_id cpu_vuln_blacklist[] __initconst = { VULNBL_INTEL_STEPPINGS(IVYBRIDGE, X86_STEPPING_ANY, SRBDS), VULNBL_INTEL_STEPPINGS(HASWELL, X86_STEPPING_ANY, SRBDS), VULNBL_INTEL_STEPPINGS(HASWELL_L, X86_STEPPING_ANY, SRBDS), VULNBL_INTEL_STEPPINGS(HASWELL_G, X86_STEPPING_ANY, SRBDS), + VULNBL_INTEL_STEPPINGS(HASWELL_X, BIT(2) | BIT(4), MMIO), + VULNBL_INTEL_STEPPINGS(BROADWELL_D, X86_STEPPINGS(0x3, 0x5), MMIO), VULNBL_INTEL_STEPPINGS(BROADWELL_G, X86_STEPPING_ANY, SRBDS), + VULNBL_INTEL_STEPPINGS(BROADWELL_X, X86_STEPPING_ANY, MMIO), VULNBL_INTEL_STEPPINGS(BROADWELL, X86_STEPPING_ANY, SRBDS), + VULNBL_INTEL_STEPPINGS(SKYLAKE_L, X86_STEPPINGS(0x3, 0x3), SRBDS | MMIO), VULNBL_INTEL_STEPPINGS(SKYLAKE_L, X86_STEPPING_ANY, SRBDS), + VULNBL_INTEL_STEPPINGS(SKYLAKE_X, BIT(3) | BIT(4) | BIT(6) | + BIT(7) | BIT(0xB), MMIO), + VULNBL_INTEL_STEPPINGS(SKYLAKE, X86_STEPPINGS(0x3, 0x3), SRBDS | MMIO), VULNBL_INTEL_STEPPINGS(SKYLAKE, X86_STEPPING_ANY, SRBDS), - VULNBL_INTEL_STEPPINGS(KABYLAKE_L, X86_STEPPINGS(0x0, 0xC), SRBDS), - VULNBL_INTEL_STEPPINGS(KABYLAKE, X86_STEPPINGS(0x0, 0xD), SRBDS), + VULNBL_INTEL_STEPPINGS(KABYLAKE_L, X86_STEPPINGS(0x9, 0xC), SRBDS | MMIO), + VULNBL_INTEL_STEPPINGS(KABYLAKE_L, X86_STEPPINGS(0x0, 0x8), SRBDS), + VULNBL_INTEL_STEPPINGS(KABYLAKE, X86_STEPPINGS(0x9, 0xD), SRBDS | MMIO), + VULNBL_INTEL_STEPPINGS(KABYLAKE, X86_STEPPINGS(0x0, 0x8), SRBDS), + VULNBL_INTEL_STEPPINGS(ICELAKE_L, X86_STEPPINGS(0x5, 0x5), MMIO), + VULNBL_INTEL_STEPPINGS(ICELAKE_D, X86_STEPPINGS(0x1, 0x1), MMIO), + VULNBL_INTEL_STEPPINGS(ICELAKE_X, X86_STEPPINGS(0x4, 0x6), MMIO), + VULNBL_INTEL_STEPPINGS(COMETLAKE, BIT(2) | BIT(3) | BIT(5), MMIO), + VULNBL_INTEL_STEPPINGS(COMETLAKE_L, X86_STEPPINGS(0x0, 0x1), MMIO), + VULNBL_INTEL_STEPPINGS(LAKEFIELD, X86_STEPPINGS(0x1, 0x1), MMIO), + VULNBL_INTEL_STEPPINGS(ROCKETLAKE, X86_STEPPINGS(0x1, 0x1), MMIO), + VULNBL_INTEL_STEPPINGS(ATOM_TREMONT, X86_STEPPINGS(0x1, 0x1), MMIO), + VULNBL_INTEL_STEPPINGS(ATOM_TREMONT_D, X86_STEPPING_ANY, MMIO), + VULNBL_INTEL_STEPPINGS(ATOM_TREMONT_L, X86_STEPPINGS(0x0, 0x0), MMIO), {} }; @@ -1130,6 +1151,13 @@ u64 x86_read_arch_cap_msr(void) return ia32_cap; } +static bool arch_cap_mmio_immune(u64 ia32_cap) +{ + return (ia32_cap & ARCH_CAP_FBSDP_NO && + ia32_cap & ARCH_CAP_PSDP_NO && + ia32_cap & ARCH_CAP_SBDR_SSDP_NO); +} + static void __init cpu_set_bug_bits(struct cpuinfo_x86 *c) { u64 ia32_cap = x86_read_arch_cap_msr(); @@ -1189,6 +1217,17 @@ static void __init cpu_set_bug_bits(struct cpuinfo_x86 *c) cpu_matches(cpu_vuln_blacklist, SRBDS)) setup_force_cpu_bug(X86_BUG_SRBDS); + /* + * Processor MMIO Stale Data bug enumeration + * + * Affected CPU list is generally enough to enumerate the vulnerability, + * but for virtualization case check for ARCH_CAP MSR bits also, VMM may + * not want the guest to enumerate the bug. + */ + if (cpu_matches(cpu_vuln_blacklist, MMIO) && + !arch_cap_mmio_immune(ia32_cap)) + setup_force_cpu_bug(X86_BUG_MMIO_STALE_DATA); + if (cpu_matches(cpu_vuln_whitelist, NO_MELTDOWN)) return; diff --git a/tools/arch/x86/include/asm/cpufeatures.h b/tools/arch/x86/include/asm/cpufeatures.h index b58730cc12e8..a7b5c5efcf3b 100644 --- a/tools/arch/x86/include/asm/cpufeatures.h +++ b/tools/arch/x86/include/asm/cpufeatures.h @@ -417,5 +417,6 @@ #define X86_BUG_TAA X86_BUG(22) /* CPU is affected by TSX Async Abort(TAA) */ #define X86_BUG_ITLB_MULTIHIT X86_BUG(23) /* CPU may incur MCE during certain page attribute changes */ #define X86_BUG_SRBDS X86_BUG(24) /* CPU may leak RNG bits if not mitigated */ +#define X86_BUG_MMIO_STALE_DATA X86_BUG(25) /* CPU is affected by Processor MMIO Stale Data vulnerabilities */ #endif /* _ASM_X86_CPUFEATURES_H */ diff --git a/tools/arch/x86/include/asm/msr-index.h b/tools/arch/x86/include/asm/msr-index.h index 972a34d93505..37a7b1ec1ac0 100644 --- a/tools/arch/x86/include/asm/msr-index.h +++ b/tools/arch/x86/include/asm/msr-index.h @@ -114,6 +114,25 @@ * Not susceptible to * TSX Async Abort (TAA) vulnerabilities. */ +#define ARCH_CAP_SBDR_SSDP_NO BIT(13) /* + * Not susceptible to SBDR and SSDP + * variants of Processor MMIO stale data + * vulnerabilities. + */ +#define ARCH_CAP_FBSDP_NO BIT(14) /* + * Not susceptible to FBSDP variant of + * Processor MMIO stale data + * vulnerabilities. + */ +#define ARCH_CAP_PSDP_NO BIT(15) /* + * Not susceptible to PSDP variant of + * Processor MMIO stale data + * vulnerabilities. + */ +#define ARCH_CAP_FB_CLEAR BIT(17) /* + * VERW clears CPU fill buffer + * even on MDS_NO CPUs. + */ #define MSR_IA32_FLUSH_CMD 0x0000010b #define L1D_FLUSH BIT(0) /* -- Gitee From b1f95f55abe644102a498908f2dad6dac2a0f78a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Pawan Gupta Date: Thu, 19 May 2022 20:28:10 -0700 Subject: [PATCH 03/10] x86/speculation: Add a common function for MD_CLEAR mitigation update stable inclusion from stable-5.10.123 commit f83d4e5be4a3955a6c8af61ecec0934d0ece40c0 category: bugfix issue: I5HNPE CVE: CVE-2022-21123,CVE-2022-21125,CVE-2022-21166 Signed-off-by: gaochao --------------------------------------- x86/speculation: Add a common function for MD_CLEAR mitigation update commit f52ea6c26953fed339aa4eae717ee5c2133c7ff2 upstream Processor MMIO Stale Data mitigation uses similar mitigation as MDS and TAA. In preparation for adding its mitigation, add a common function to update all mitigations that depend on MD_CLEAR. [ bp: Add a newline in md_clear_update_mitigation() to separate statements better. ] Signed-off-by: Pawan Gupta Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman --- arch/x86/kernel/cpu/bugs.c | 59 +++++++++++++++++++++----------------- 1 file changed, 33 insertions(+), 26 deletions(-) diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/bugs.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/bugs.c index de39f73e0051..490809aa8f0e 100644 --- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/bugs.c +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/bugs.c @@ -41,7 +41,7 @@ static void __init spectre_v2_select_mitigation(void); static void __init ssb_select_mitigation(void); static void __init l1tf_select_mitigation(void); static void __init mds_select_mitigation(void); -static void __init mds_print_mitigation(void); +static void __init md_clear_update_mitigation(void); static void __init taa_select_mitigation(void); static void __init srbds_select_mitigation(void); @@ -114,10 +114,10 @@ void __init check_bugs(void) srbds_select_mitigation(); /* - * As MDS and TAA mitigations are inter-related, print MDS - * mitigation until after TAA mitigation selection is done. + * As MDS and TAA mitigations are inter-related, update and print their + * mitigation after TAA mitigation selection is done. */ - mds_print_mitigation(); + md_clear_update_mitigation(); arch_smt_update(); @@ -258,14 +258,6 @@ static void __init mds_select_mitigation(void) } } -static void __init mds_print_mitigation(void) -{ - if (!boot_cpu_has_bug(X86_BUG_MDS) || cpu_mitigations_off()) - return; - - pr_info("%s\n", mds_strings[mds_mitigation]); -} - static int __init mds_cmdline(char *str) { if (!boot_cpu_has_bug(X86_BUG_MDS)) @@ -320,7 +312,7 @@ static void __init taa_select_mitigation(void) /* TSX previously disabled by tsx=off */ if (!boot_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_RTM)) { taa_mitigation = TAA_MITIGATION_TSX_DISABLED; - goto out; + return; } if (cpu_mitigations_off()) { @@ -334,7 +326,7 @@ static void __init taa_select_mitigation(void) */ if (taa_mitigation == TAA_MITIGATION_OFF && mds_mitigation == MDS_MITIGATION_OFF) - goto out; + return; if (boot_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_MD_CLEAR)) taa_mitigation = TAA_MITIGATION_VERW; @@ -366,18 +358,6 @@ static void __init taa_select_mitigation(void) if (taa_nosmt || cpu_mitigations_auto_nosmt()) cpu_smt_disable(false); - - /* - * Update MDS mitigation, if necessary, as the mds_user_clear is - * now enabled for TAA mitigation. - */ - if (mds_mitigation == MDS_MITIGATION_OFF && - boot_cpu_has_bug(X86_BUG_MDS)) { - mds_mitigation = MDS_MITIGATION_FULL; - mds_select_mitigation(); - } -out: - pr_info("%s\n", taa_strings[taa_mitigation]); } static int __init tsx_async_abort_parse_cmdline(char *str) @@ -401,6 +381,33 @@ static int __init tsx_async_abort_parse_cmdline(char *str) } early_param("tsx_async_abort", tsx_async_abort_parse_cmdline); +#undef pr_fmt +#define pr_fmt(fmt) "" fmt + +static void __init md_clear_update_mitigation(void) +{ + if (cpu_mitigations_off()) + return; + + if (!static_key_enabled(&mds_user_clear)) + goto out; + + /* + * mds_user_clear is now enabled. Update MDS mitigation, if + * necessary. + */ + if (mds_mitigation == MDS_MITIGATION_OFF && + boot_cpu_has_bug(X86_BUG_MDS)) { + mds_mitigation = MDS_MITIGATION_FULL; + mds_select_mitigation(); + } +out: + if (boot_cpu_has_bug(X86_BUG_MDS)) + pr_info("MDS: %s\n", mds_strings[mds_mitigation]); + if (boot_cpu_has_bug(X86_BUG_TAA)) + pr_info("TAA: %s\n", taa_strings[taa_mitigation]); +} + #undef pr_fmt #define pr_fmt(fmt) "SRBDS: " fmt -- Gitee From a84dbf25683c871ba0f12e43d660c5ba54cdbb02 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Pawan Gupta Date: Thu, 19 May 2022 20:29:11 -0700 Subject: [PATCH 04/10] x86/speculation/mmio: Add mitigation for Processor MMIO Stale Data stable inclusion from stable-5.10.123 commit 26f6f231f6a5a79ccc274967939b22602dec76e8 category: bugfix issue: I5HNPE CVE: CVE-2022-21123,CVE-2022-21125,CVE-2022-21166 Signed-off-by: gaochao --------------------------------------- x86/speculation/mmio: Add mitigation for Processor MMIO Stale Data commit 8cb861e9e3c9a55099ad3d08e1a3b653d29c33ca upstream Processor MMIO Stale Data is a class of vulnerabilities that may expose data after an MMIO operation. For details please refer to Documentation/admin-guide/hw-vuln/processor_mmio_stale_data.rst. These vulnerabilities are broadly categorized as: Device Register Partial Write (DRPW): Some endpoint MMIO registers incorrectly handle writes that are smaller than the register size. Instead of aborting the write or only copying the correct subset of bytes (for example, 2 bytes for a 2-byte write), more bytes than specified by the write transaction may be written to the register. On some processors, this may expose stale data from the fill buffers of the core that created the write transaction. Shared Buffers Data Sampling (SBDS): After propagators may have moved data around the uncore and copied stale data into client core fill buffers, processors affected by MFBDS can leak data from the fill buffer. Shared Buffers Data Read (SBDR): It is similar to Shared Buffer Data Sampling (SBDS) except that the data is directly read into the architectural software-visible state. An attacker can use these vulnerabilities to extract data from CPU fill buffers using MDS and TAA methods. Mitigate it by clearing the CPU fill buffers using the VERW instruction before returning to a user or a guest. On CPUs not affected by MDS and TAA, user application cannot sample data from CPU fill buffers using MDS or TAA. A guest with MMIO access can still use DRPW or SBDR to extract data architecturally. Mitigate it with VERW instruction to clear fill buffers before VMENTER for MMIO capable guests. Add a kernel parameter mmio_stale_data={off|full|full,nosmt} to control the mitigation. Signed-off-by: Pawan Gupta Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman --- .../admin-guide/kernel-parameters.txt | 36 ++++++ arch/x86/include/asm/nospec-branch.h | 2 + arch/x86/kernel/cpu/bugs.c | 111 +++++++++++++++++- arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c | 3 + 4 files changed, 148 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-) diff --git a/Documentation/admin-guide/kernel-parameters.txt b/Documentation/admin-guide/kernel-parameters.txt index deeca8101c31..c2f4ef0dce6d 100644 --- a/Documentation/admin-guide/kernel-parameters.txt +++ b/Documentation/admin-guide/kernel-parameters.txt @@ -2867,6 +2867,7 @@ kvm.nx_huge_pages=off [X86] no_entry_flush [PPC] no_uaccess_flush [PPC] + mmio_stale_data=off [X86] Exceptions: This does not have any effect on @@ -2888,6 +2889,7 @@ Equivalent to: l1tf=flush,nosmt [X86] mds=full,nosmt [X86] tsx_async_abort=full,nosmt [X86] + mmio_stale_data=full,nosmt [X86] mminit_loglevel= [KNL] When CONFIG_DEBUG_MEMORY_INIT is set, this @@ -2897,6 +2899,40 @@ log everything. Information is printed at KERN_DEBUG so loglevel=8 may also need to be specified. + mmio_stale_data= + [X86,INTEL] Control mitigation for the Processor + MMIO Stale Data vulnerabilities. + + Processor MMIO Stale Data is a class of + vulnerabilities that may expose data after an MMIO + operation. Exposed data could originate or end in + the same CPU buffers as affected by MDS and TAA. + Therefore, similar to MDS and TAA, the mitigation + is to clear the affected CPU buffers. + + This parameter controls the mitigation. The + options are: + + full - Enable mitigation on vulnerable CPUs + + full,nosmt - Enable mitigation and disable SMT on + vulnerable CPUs. + + off - Unconditionally disable mitigation + + On MDS or TAA affected machines, + mmio_stale_data=off can be prevented by an active + MDS or TAA mitigation as these vulnerabilities are + mitigated with the same mechanism so in order to + disable this mitigation, you need to specify + mds=off and tsx_async_abort=off too. + + Not specifying this option is equivalent to + mmio_stale_data=full. + + For details see: + Documentation/admin-guide/hw-vuln/processor_mmio_stale_data.rst + module.sig_enforce [KNL] When CONFIG_MODULE_SIG is set, this means that modules without (valid) signatures will fail to load. diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/nospec-branch.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/nospec-branch.h index 4d0f5386e637..e247151c3dcf 100644 --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/nospec-branch.h +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/nospec-branch.h @@ -255,6 +255,8 @@ DECLARE_STATIC_KEY_FALSE(switch_mm_always_ibpb); DECLARE_STATIC_KEY_FALSE(mds_user_clear); DECLARE_STATIC_KEY_FALSE(mds_idle_clear); +DECLARE_STATIC_KEY_FALSE(mmio_stale_data_clear); + #include /** diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/bugs.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/bugs.c index 490809aa8f0e..b703ccbe3e83 100644 --- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/bugs.c +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/bugs.c @@ -43,6 +43,7 @@ static void __init l1tf_select_mitigation(void); static void __init mds_select_mitigation(void); static void __init md_clear_update_mitigation(void); static void __init taa_select_mitigation(void); +static void __init mmio_select_mitigation(void); static void __init srbds_select_mitigation(void); /* The base value of the SPEC_CTRL MSR that always has to be preserved. */ @@ -77,6 +78,10 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(mds_user_clear); DEFINE_STATIC_KEY_FALSE(mds_idle_clear); EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(mds_idle_clear); +/* Controls CPU Fill buffer clear before KVM guest MMIO accesses */ +DEFINE_STATIC_KEY_FALSE(mmio_stale_data_clear); +EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(mmio_stale_data_clear); + void __init check_bugs(void) { identify_boot_cpu(); @@ -111,11 +116,13 @@ void __init check_bugs(void) l1tf_select_mitigation(); mds_select_mitigation(); taa_select_mitigation(); + mmio_select_mitigation(); srbds_select_mitigation(); /* - * As MDS and TAA mitigations are inter-related, update and print their - * mitigation after TAA mitigation selection is done. + * As MDS, TAA and MMIO Stale Data mitigations are inter-related, update + * and print their mitigation after MDS, TAA and MMIO Stale Data + * mitigation selection is done. */ md_clear_update_mitigation(); @@ -381,6 +388,90 @@ static int __init tsx_async_abort_parse_cmdline(char *str) } early_param("tsx_async_abort", tsx_async_abort_parse_cmdline); +#undef pr_fmt +#define pr_fmt(fmt) "MMIO Stale Data: " fmt + +enum mmio_mitigations { + MMIO_MITIGATION_OFF, + MMIO_MITIGATION_UCODE_NEEDED, + MMIO_MITIGATION_VERW, +}; + +/* Default mitigation for Processor MMIO Stale Data vulnerabilities */ +static enum mmio_mitigations mmio_mitigation __ro_after_init = MMIO_MITIGATION_VERW; +static bool mmio_nosmt __ro_after_init = false; + +static const char * const mmio_strings[] = { + [MMIO_MITIGATION_OFF] = "Vulnerable", + [MMIO_MITIGATION_UCODE_NEEDED] = "Vulnerable: Clear CPU buffers attempted, no microcode", + [MMIO_MITIGATION_VERW] = "Mitigation: Clear CPU buffers", +}; + +static void __init mmio_select_mitigation(void) +{ + u64 ia32_cap; + + if (!boot_cpu_has_bug(X86_BUG_MMIO_STALE_DATA) || + cpu_mitigations_off()) { + mmio_mitigation = MMIO_MITIGATION_OFF; + return; + } + + if (mmio_mitigation == MMIO_MITIGATION_OFF) + return; + + ia32_cap = x86_read_arch_cap_msr(); + + /* + * Enable CPU buffer clear mitigation for host and VMM, if also affected + * by MDS or TAA. Otherwise, enable mitigation for VMM only. + */ + if (boot_cpu_has_bug(X86_BUG_MDS) || (boot_cpu_has_bug(X86_BUG_TAA) && + boot_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_RTM))) + static_branch_enable(&mds_user_clear); + else + static_branch_enable(&mmio_stale_data_clear); + + /* + * Check if the system has the right microcode. + * + * CPU Fill buffer clear mitigation is enumerated by either an explicit + * FB_CLEAR or by the presence of both MD_CLEAR and L1D_FLUSH on MDS + * affected systems. + */ + if ((ia32_cap & ARCH_CAP_FB_CLEAR) || + (boot_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_MD_CLEAR) && + boot_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_FLUSH_L1D) && + !(ia32_cap & ARCH_CAP_MDS_NO))) + mmio_mitigation = MMIO_MITIGATION_VERW; + else + mmio_mitigation = MMIO_MITIGATION_UCODE_NEEDED; + + if (mmio_nosmt || cpu_mitigations_auto_nosmt()) + cpu_smt_disable(false); +} + +static int __init mmio_stale_data_parse_cmdline(char *str) +{ + if (!boot_cpu_has_bug(X86_BUG_MMIO_STALE_DATA)) + return 0; + + if (!str) + return -EINVAL; + + if (!strcmp(str, "off")) { + mmio_mitigation = MMIO_MITIGATION_OFF; + } else if (!strcmp(str, "full")) { + mmio_mitigation = MMIO_MITIGATION_VERW; + } else if (!strcmp(str, "full,nosmt")) { + mmio_mitigation = MMIO_MITIGATION_VERW; + mmio_nosmt = true; + } + + return 0; +} +early_param("mmio_stale_data", mmio_stale_data_parse_cmdline); + #undef pr_fmt #define pr_fmt(fmt) "" fmt @@ -393,19 +484,31 @@ static void __init md_clear_update_mitigation(void) goto out; /* - * mds_user_clear is now enabled. Update MDS mitigation, if - * necessary. + * mds_user_clear is now enabled. Update MDS, TAA and MMIO Stale Data + * mitigation, if necessary. */ if (mds_mitigation == MDS_MITIGATION_OFF && boot_cpu_has_bug(X86_BUG_MDS)) { mds_mitigation = MDS_MITIGATION_FULL; mds_select_mitigation(); } + if (taa_mitigation == TAA_MITIGATION_OFF && + boot_cpu_has_bug(X86_BUG_TAA)) { + taa_mitigation = TAA_MITIGATION_VERW; + taa_select_mitigation(); + } + if (mmio_mitigation == MMIO_MITIGATION_OFF && + boot_cpu_has_bug(X86_BUG_MMIO_STALE_DATA)) { + mmio_mitigation = MMIO_MITIGATION_VERW; + mmio_select_mitigation(); + } out: if (boot_cpu_has_bug(X86_BUG_MDS)) pr_info("MDS: %s\n", mds_strings[mds_mitigation]); if (boot_cpu_has_bug(X86_BUG_TAA)) pr_info("TAA: %s\n", taa_strings[taa_mitigation]); + if (boot_cpu_has_bug(X86_BUG_MMIO_STALE_DATA)) + pr_info("MMIO Stale Data: %s\n", mmio_strings[mmio_mitigation]); } #undef pr_fmt diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c index baa4244f3e6a..4417b72ab065 100644 --- a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c @@ -6625,6 +6625,9 @@ static noinstr void vmx_vcpu_enter_exit(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, vmx_l1d_flush(vcpu); else if (static_branch_unlikely(&mds_user_clear)) mds_clear_cpu_buffers(); + else if (static_branch_unlikely(&mmio_stale_data_clear) && + kvm_arch_has_assigned_device(vcpu->kvm)) + mds_clear_cpu_buffers(); if (vcpu->arch.cr2 != native_read_cr2()) native_write_cr2(vcpu->arch.cr2); -- Gitee From 7903b4e79031378f428766704f2db49307edadd6 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Pawan Gupta Date: Thu, 19 May 2022 20:30:12 -0700 Subject: [PATCH 05/10] x86/bugs: Group MDS, TAA & Processor MMIO Stale Data mitigations stable inclusion from stable-5.10.123 commit 56f0bca5e9c8456b7bb7089cbb6de866a9ba6da9 category: bugfix issue: I5HNPE CVE: CVE-2022-21123,CVE-2022-21125,CVE-2022-21166 Signed-off-by: gaochao --------------------------------------- x86/bugs: Group MDS, TAA & Processor MMIO Stale Data mitigations commit e5925fb867290ee924fcf2fe3ca887b792714366 upstream MDS, TAA and Processor MMIO Stale Data mitigations rely on clearing CPU buffers. Moreover, status of these mitigations affects each other. During boot, it is important to maintain the order in which these mitigations are selected. This is especially true for md_clear_update_mitigation() that needs to be called after MDS, TAA and Processor MMIO Stale Data mitigation selection is done. Introduce md_clear_select_mitigation(), and select all these mitigations from there. This reflects relationships between these mitigations and ensures proper ordering. Signed-off-by: Pawan Gupta Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman --- arch/x86/kernel/cpu/bugs.c | 26 ++++++++++++++++---------- 1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-) diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/bugs.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/bugs.c index b703ccbe3e83..d4c8da792712 100644 --- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/bugs.c +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/bugs.c @@ -42,6 +42,7 @@ static void __init ssb_select_mitigation(void); static void __init l1tf_select_mitigation(void); static void __init mds_select_mitigation(void); static void __init md_clear_update_mitigation(void); +static void __init md_clear_select_mitigation(void); static void __init taa_select_mitigation(void); static void __init mmio_select_mitigation(void); static void __init srbds_select_mitigation(void); @@ -114,18 +115,9 @@ void __init check_bugs(void) spectre_v2_select_mitigation(); ssb_select_mitigation(); l1tf_select_mitigation(); - mds_select_mitigation(); - taa_select_mitigation(); - mmio_select_mitigation(); + md_clear_select_mitigation(); srbds_select_mitigation(); - /* - * As MDS, TAA and MMIO Stale Data mitigations are inter-related, update - * and print their mitigation after MDS, TAA and MMIO Stale Data - * mitigation selection is done. - */ - md_clear_update_mitigation(); - arch_smt_update(); #ifdef CONFIG_X86_32 @@ -511,6 +503,20 @@ static void __init md_clear_update_mitigation(void) pr_info("MMIO Stale Data: %s\n", mmio_strings[mmio_mitigation]); } +static void __init md_clear_select_mitigation(void) +{ + mds_select_mitigation(); + taa_select_mitigation(); + mmio_select_mitigation(); + + /* + * As MDS, TAA and MMIO Stale Data mitigations are inter-related, update + * and print their mitigation after MDS, TAA and MMIO Stale Data + * mitigation selection is done. + */ + md_clear_update_mitigation(); +} + #undef pr_fmt #define pr_fmt(fmt) "SRBDS: " fmt -- Gitee From c5db0a4451e5a79b0275d6bcbf4ac682d3479db2 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Pawan Gupta Date: Thu, 19 May 2022 20:31:12 -0700 Subject: [PATCH 06/10] x86/speculation/mmio: Enable CPU Fill buffer clearing on idle stable inclusion from stable-5.10.123 commit 3eb1180564fa0ecedc33b44029da7687c0a9fbf5 category: bugfix issue: I5HNPE CVE: CVE-2022-21123,CVE-2022-21125,CVE-2022-21166 Signed-off-by: gaochao --------------------------------------- x86/speculation/mmio: Enable CPU Fill buffer clearing on idle commit 99a83db5a605137424e1efe29dc0573d6a5b6316 upstream When the CPU is affected by Processor MMIO Stale Data vulnerabilities, Fill Buffer Stale Data Propagator (FBSDP) can propagate stale data out of Fill buffer to uncore buffer when CPU goes idle. Stale data can then be exploited with other variants using MMIO operations. Mitigate it by clearing the Fill buffer before entering idle state. Signed-off-by: Pawan Gupta Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner Co-developed-by: Josh Poimboeuf Signed-off-by: Josh Poimboeuf Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman --- arch/x86/kernel/cpu/bugs.c | 16 ++++++++++++++-- 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-) diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/bugs.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/bugs.c index d4c8da792712..685fc693fbab 100644 --- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/bugs.c +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/bugs.c @@ -424,6 +424,14 @@ static void __init mmio_select_mitigation(void) else static_branch_enable(&mmio_stale_data_clear); + /* + * If Processor-MMIO-Stale-Data bug is present and Fill Buffer data can + * be propagated to uncore buffers, clearing the Fill buffers on idle + * is required irrespective of SMT state. + */ + if (!(ia32_cap & ARCH_CAP_FBSDP_NO)) + static_branch_enable(&mds_idle_clear); + /* * Check if the system has the right microcode. * @@ -1188,6 +1196,8 @@ static void update_indir_branch_cond(void) /* Update the static key controlling the MDS CPU buffer clear in idle */ static void update_mds_branch_idle(void) { + u64 ia32_cap = x86_read_arch_cap_msr(); + /* * Enable the idle clearing if SMT is active on CPUs which are * affected only by MSBDS and not any other MDS variant. @@ -1199,10 +1209,12 @@ static void update_mds_branch_idle(void) if (!boot_cpu_has_bug(X86_BUG_MSBDS_ONLY)) return; - if (sched_smt_active()) + if (sched_smt_active()) { static_branch_enable(&mds_idle_clear); - else + } else if (mmio_mitigation == MMIO_MITIGATION_OFF || + (ia32_cap & ARCH_CAP_FBSDP_NO)) { static_branch_disable(&mds_idle_clear); + } } #define MDS_MSG_SMT "MDS CPU bug present and SMT on, data leak possible. See https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/latest/admin-guide/hw-vuln/mds.html for more details.\n" -- Gitee From 85fecf10d358feb7eca3afe8bb4c898acb66c6ae Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Pawan Gupta Date: Thu, 19 May 2022 20:32:13 -0700 Subject: [PATCH 07/10] x86/speculation/mmio: Add sysfs reporting for Processor MMIO Stale Data stable inclusion from stable-5.10.123 commit 001415e4e626403c9ff35f2498feb0021d0c8328 category: bugfix issue: I5HNPE CVE: CVE-2022-21123,CVE-2022-21125,CVE-2022-21166 Signed-off-by: gaochao --------------------------------------- x86/speculation/mmio: Add sysfs reporting for Processor MMIO Stale Data commit 8d50cdf8b8341770bc6367bce40c0c1bb0e1d5b3 upstream Add the sysfs reporting file for Processor MMIO Stale Data vulnerability. It exposes the vulnerability and mitigation state similar to the existing files for the other hardware vulnerabilities. Signed-off-by: Pawan Gupta Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman --- .../ABI/testing/sysfs-devices-system-cpu | 1 + arch/x86/kernel/cpu/bugs.c | 22 +++++++++++++++++++ drivers/base/cpu.c | 8 +++++++ include/linux/cpu.h | 3 +++ 4 files changed, 34 insertions(+) diff --git a/Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-devices-system-cpu b/Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-devices-system-cpu index 1a04ca8162ad..44c6e5730398 100644 --- a/Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-devices-system-cpu +++ b/Documentation/ABI/testing/sysfs-devices-system-cpu @@ -510,6 +510,7 @@ What: /sys/devices/system/cpu/vulnerabilities /sys/devices/system/cpu/vulnerabilities/srbds /sys/devices/system/cpu/vulnerabilities/tsx_async_abort /sys/devices/system/cpu/vulnerabilities/itlb_multihit + /sys/devices/system/cpu/vulnerabilities/mmio_stale_data Date: January 2018 Contact: Linux kernel mailing list Description: Information about CPU vulnerabilities diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/bugs.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/bugs.c index 685fc693fbab..374cfbe72b6c 100644 --- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/bugs.c +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/bugs.c @@ -1843,6 +1843,20 @@ static ssize_t tsx_async_abort_show_state(char *buf) sched_smt_active() ? "vulnerable" : "disabled"); } +static ssize_t mmio_stale_data_show_state(char *buf) +{ + if (mmio_mitigation == MMIO_MITIGATION_OFF) + return sysfs_emit(buf, "%s\n", mmio_strings[mmio_mitigation]); + + if (boot_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_HYPERVISOR)) { + return sysfs_emit(buf, "%s; SMT Host state unknown\n", + mmio_strings[mmio_mitigation]); + } + + return sysfs_emit(buf, "%s; SMT %s\n", mmio_strings[mmio_mitigation], + sched_smt_active() ? "vulnerable" : "disabled"); +} + static char *stibp_state(void) { if (spectre_v2_in_eibrs_mode(spectre_v2_enabled)) @@ -1943,6 +1957,9 @@ static ssize_t cpu_show_common(struct device *dev, struct device_attribute *attr case X86_BUG_SRBDS: return srbds_show_state(buf); + case X86_BUG_MMIO_STALE_DATA: + return mmio_stale_data_show_state(buf); + default: break; } @@ -1994,4 +2011,9 @@ ssize_t cpu_show_srbds(struct device *dev, struct device_attribute *attr, char * { return cpu_show_common(dev, attr, buf, X86_BUG_SRBDS); } + +ssize_t cpu_show_mmio_stale_data(struct device *dev, struct device_attribute *attr, char *buf) +{ + return cpu_show_common(dev, attr, buf, X86_BUG_MMIO_STALE_DATA); +} #endif diff --git a/drivers/base/cpu.c b/drivers/base/cpu.c index 025a6c9dd622..b6091109bfd2 100644 --- a/drivers/base/cpu.c +++ b/drivers/base/cpu.c @@ -604,6 +604,12 @@ ssize_t __weak cpu_show_srbds(struct device *dev, return sysfs_emit(buf, "Not affected\n"); } +ssize_t __weak cpu_show_mmio_stale_data(struct device *dev, + struct device_attribute *attr, char *buf) +{ + return sysfs_emit(buf, "Not affected\n"); +} + static DEVICE_ATTR(meltdown, 0444, cpu_show_meltdown, NULL); static DEVICE_ATTR(spectre_v1, 0444, cpu_show_spectre_v1, NULL); static DEVICE_ATTR(spectre_v2, 0444, cpu_show_spectre_v2, NULL); @@ -613,6 +619,7 @@ static DEVICE_ATTR(mds, 0444, cpu_show_mds, NULL); static DEVICE_ATTR(tsx_async_abort, 0444, cpu_show_tsx_async_abort, NULL); static DEVICE_ATTR(itlb_multihit, 0444, cpu_show_itlb_multihit, NULL); static DEVICE_ATTR(srbds, 0444, cpu_show_srbds, NULL); +static DEVICE_ATTR(mmio_stale_data, 0444, cpu_show_mmio_stale_data, NULL); static struct attribute *cpu_root_vulnerabilities_attrs[] = { &dev_attr_meltdown.attr, @@ -624,6 +631,7 @@ static struct attribute *cpu_root_vulnerabilities_attrs[] = { &dev_attr_tsx_async_abort.attr, &dev_attr_itlb_multihit.attr, &dev_attr_srbds.attr, + &dev_attr_mmio_stale_data.attr, NULL }; diff --git a/include/linux/cpu.h b/include/linux/cpu.h index d6428aaf67e7..d63b8f70d123 100644 --- a/include/linux/cpu.h +++ b/include/linux/cpu.h @@ -65,6 +65,9 @@ extern ssize_t cpu_show_tsx_async_abort(struct device *dev, extern ssize_t cpu_show_itlb_multihit(struct device *dev, struct device_attribute *attr, char *buf); extern ssize_t cpu_show_srbds(struct device *dev, struct device_attribute *attr, char *buf); +extern ssize_t cpu_show_mmio_stale_data(struct device *dev, + struct device_attribute *attr, + char *buf); extern __printf(4, 5) struct device *cpu_device_create(struct device *parent, void *drvdata, -- Gitee From d1ac8c6e93a3b057de9cc30de0628b5c71eb6a5c Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Pawan Gupta Date: Thu, 19 May 2022 20:33:13 -0700 Subject: [PATCH 08/10] x86/speculation/srbds: Update SRBDS mitigation selection stable inclusion from stable-5.10.123 commit cf1c01a5e4c3e269b9211ae2ef0a57f8c9474bfc category: bugfix issue: I5HNPE CVE: CVE-2022-21123,CVE-2022-21125,CVE-2022-21166 Signed-off-by: gaochao --------------------------------------- x86/speculation/srbds: Update SRBDS mitigation selection commit 22cac9c677c95f3ac5c9244f8ca0afdc7c8afb19 upstream Currently, Linux disables SRBDS mitigation on CPUs not affected by MDS and have the TSX feature disabled. On such CPUs, secrets cannot be extracted from CPU fill buffers using MDS or TAA. Without SRBDS mitigation, Processor MMIO Stale Data vulnerabilities can be used to extract RDRAND, RDSEED, and EGETKEY data. Do not disable SRBDS mitigation by default when CPU is also affected by Processor MMIO Stale Data vulnerabilities. Signed-off-by: Pawan Gupta Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman --- arch/x86/kernel/cpu/bugs.c | 8 +++++--- 1 file changed, 5 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/bugs.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/bugs.c index 374cfbe72b6c..2a21046846b6 100644 --- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/bugs.c +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/bugs.c @@ -586,11 +586,13 @@ static void __init srbds_select_mitigation(void) return; /* - * Check to see if this is one of the MDS_NO systems supporting - * TSX that are only exposed to SRBDS when TSX is enabled. + * Check to see if this is one of the MDS_NO systems supporting TSX that + * are only exposed to SRBDS when TSX is enabled or when CPU is affected + * by Processor MMIO Stale Data vulnerability. */ ia32_cap = x86_read_arch_cap_msr(); - if ((ia32_cap & ARCH_CAP_MDS_NO) && !boot_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_RTM)) + if ((ia32_cap & ARCH_CAP_MDS_NO) && !boot_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_RTM) && + !boot_cpu_has_bug(X86_BUG_MMIO_STALE_DATA)) srbds_mitigation = SRBDS_MITIGATION_TSX_OFF; else if (boot_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_HYPERVISOR)) srbds_mitigation = SRBDS_MITIGATION_HYPERVISOR; -- Gitee From d4f2106cb19d56844d69e875a95296e0622a59a3 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Pawan Gupta Date: Thu, 19 May 2022 20:34:14 -0700 Subject: [PATCH 09/10] x86/speculation/mmio: Reuse SRBDS mitigation for SBDS stable inclusion from stable-5.10.123 commit 6df693dca31218f76c63b6fd4aa7b7db3bd6e049 category: bugfix issue: I5HNPE CVE: CVE-2022-21123,CVE-2022-21125,CVE-2022-21166 Signed-off-by: gaochao --------------------------------------- x86/speculation/mmio: Reuse SRBDS mitigation for SBDS commit a992b8a4682f119ae035a01b40d4d0665c4a2875 upstream The Shared Buffers Data Sampling (SBDS) variant of Processor MMIO Stale Data vulnerabilities may expose RDRAND, RDSEED and SGX EGETKEY data. Mitigation for this is added by a microcode update. As some of the implications of SBDS are similar to SRBDS, SRBDS mitigation infrastructure can be leveraged by SBDS. Set X86_BUG_SRBDS and use SRBDS mitigation. Mitigation is enabled by default; use srbds=off to opt-out. Mitigation status can be checked from below file: /sys/devices/system/cpu/vulnerabilities/srbds Signed-off-by: Pawan Gupta Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman --- arch/x86/kernel/cpu/common.c | 21 ++++++++++++++------- 1 file changed, 14 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-) diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/common.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/common.c index d2e11cc5bd01..4917c2698ac1 100644 --- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/common.c +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/common.c @@ -1100,6 +1100,8 @@ static const __initconst struct x86_cpu_id cpu_vuln_whitelist[] = { #define SRBDS BIT(0) /* CPU is affected by X86_BUG_MMIO_STALE_DATA */ #define MMIO BIT(1) +/* CPU is affected by Shared Buffers Data Sampling (SBDS), a variant of X86_BUG_MMIO_STALE_DATA */ +#define MMIO_SBDS BIT(2) static const struct x86_cpu_id cpu_vuln_blacklist[] __initconst = { VULNBL_INTEL_STEPPINGS(IVYBRIDGE, X86_STEPPING_ANY, SRBDS), @@ -1121,16 +1123,17 @@ static const struct x86_cpu_id cpu_vuln_blacklist[] __initconst = { VULNBL_INTEL_STEPPINGS(KABYLAKE_L, X86_STEPPINGS(0x0, 0x8), SRBDS), VULNBL_INTEL_STEPPINGS(KABYLAKE, X86_STEPPINGS(0x9, 0xD), SRBDS | MMIO), VULNBL_INTEL_STEPPINGS(KABYLAKE, X86_STEPPINGS(0x0, 0x8), SRBDS), - VULNBL_INTEL_STEPPINGS(ICELAKE_L, X86_STEPPINGS(0x5, 0x5), MMIO), + VULNBL_INTEL_STEPPINGS(ICELAKE_L, X86_STEPPINGS(0x5, 0x5), MMIO | MMIO_SBDS), VULNBL_INTEL_STEPPINGS(ICELAKE_D, X86_STEPPINGS(0x1, 0x1), MMIO), VULNBL_INTEL_STEPPINGS(ICELAKE_X, X86_STEPPINGS(0x4, 0x6), MMIO), - VULNBL_INTEL_STEPPINGS(COMETLAKE, BIT(2) | BIT(3) | BIT(5), MMIO), - VULNBL_INTEL_STEPPINGS(COMETLAKE_L, X86_STEPPINGS(0x0, 0x1), MMIO), - VULNBL_INTEL_STEPPINGS(LAKEFIELD, X86_STEPPINGS(0x1, 0x1), MMIO), + VULNBL_INTEL_STEPPINGS(COMETLAKE, BIT(2) | BIT(3) | BIT(5), MMIO | MMIO_SBDS), + VULNBL_INTEL_STEPPINGS(COMETLAKE_L, X86_STEPPINGS(0x1, 0x1), MMIO | MMIO_SBDS), + VULNBL_INTEL_STEPPINGS(COMETLAKE_L, X86_STEPPINGS(0x0, 0x0), MMIO), + VULNBL_INTEL_STEPPINGS(LAKEFIELD, X86_STEPPINGS(0x1, 0x1), MMIO | MMIO_SBDS), VULNBL_INTEL_STEPPINGS(ROCKETLAKE, X86_STEPPINGS(0x1, 0x1), MMIO), - VULNBL_INTEL_STEPPINGS(ATOM_TREMONT, X86_STEPPINGS(0x1, 0x1), MMIO), + VULNBL_INTEL_STEPPINGS(ATOM_TREMONT, X86_STEPPINGS(0x1, 0x1), MMIO | MMIO_SBDS), VULNBL_INTEL_STEPPINGS(ATOM_TREMONT_D, X86_STEPPING_ANY, MMIO), - VULNBL_INTEL_STEPPINGS(ATOM_TREMONT_L, X86_STEPPINGS(0x0, 0x0), MMIO), + VULNBL_INTEL_STEPPINGS(ATOM_TREMONT_L, X86_STEPPINGS(0x0, 0x0), MMIO | MMIO_SBDS), {} }; @@ -1211,10 +1214,14 @@ static void __init cpu_set_bug_bits(struct cpuinfo_x86 *c) /* * SRBDS affects CPUs which support RDRAND or RDSEED and are listed * in the vulnerability blacklist. + * + * Some of the implications and mitigation of Shared Buffers Data + * Sampling (SBDS) are similar to SRBDS. Give SBDS same treatment as + * SRBDS. */ if ((cpu_has(c, X86_FEATURE_RDRAND) || cpu_has(c, X86_FEATURE_RDSEED)) && - cpu_matches(cpu_vuln_blacklist, SRBDS)) + cpu_matches(cpu_vuln_blacklist, SRBDS | MMIO_SBDS)) setup_force_cpu_bug(X86_BUG_SRBDS); /* -- Gitee From 5de4366f9c404d1af528aea65a3e5a725ed2e34a Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Pawan Gupta Date: Thu, 19 May 2022 20:35:15 -0700 Subject: [PATCH 10/10] KVM: x86/speculation: Disable Fill buffer clear within guests stable inclusion from stable-5.10.123 commit bde15fdcce44956278b4f50680b7363ca126ffb9 category: bugfix issue: I5HNPE CVE: CVE-2022-21123,CVE-2022-21125,CVE-2022-21166 Signed-off-by: gaochao --------------------------------------- KVM: x86/speculation: Disable Fill buffer clear within guests commit 027bbb884be006b05d9c577d6401686053aa789e upstream The enumeration of MD_CLEAR in CPUID(EAX=7,ECX=0).EDX{bit 10} is not an accurate indicator on all CPUs of whether the VERW instruction will overwrite fill buffers. FB_CLEAR enumeration in IA32_ARCH_CAPABILITIES{bit 17} covers the case of CPUs that are not vulnerable to MDS/TAA, indicating that microcode does overwrite fill buffers. Guests running in VMM environments may not be aware of all the capabilities/vulnerabilities of the host CPU. Specifically, a guest may apply MDS/TAA mitigations when a virtual CPU is enumerated as vulnerable to MDS/TAA even when the physical CPU is not. On CPUs that enumerate FB_CLEAR_CTRL the VMM may set FB_CLEAR_DIS to skip overwriting of fill buffers by the VERW instruction. This is done by setting FB_CLEAR_DIS during VMENTER and resetting on VMEXIT. For guests that enumerate FB_CLEAR (explicitly asking for fill buffer clear capability) the VMM will not use FB_CLEAR_DIS. Irrespective of guest state, host overwrites CPU buffers before VMENTER to protect itself from an MMIO capable guest, as part of mitigation for MMIO Stale Data vulnerabilities. Signed-off-by: Pawan Gupta Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman --- arch/x86/include/asm/msr-index.h | 6 +++ arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c | 69 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++ arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.h | 2 + arch/x86/kvm/x86.c | 3 ++ tools/arch/x86/include/asm/msr-index.h | 6 +++ 5 files changed, 86 insertions(+) diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/msr-index.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/msr-index.h index 37a7b1ec1ac0..96973d197972 100644 --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/msr-index.h +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/msr-index.h @@ -133,6 +133,11 @@ * VERW clears CPU fill buffer * even on MDS_NO CPUs. */ +#define ARCH_CAP_FB_CLEAR_CTRL BIT(18) /* + * MSR_IA32_MCU_OPT_CTRL[FB_CLEAR_DIS] + * bit available to control VERW + * behavior. + */ #define MSR_IA32_FLUSH_CMD 0x0000010b #define L1D_FLUSH BIT(0) /* @@ -150,6 +155,7 @@ /* SRBDS support */ #define MSR_IA32_MCU_OPT_CTRL 0x00000123 #define RNGDS_MITG_DIS BIT(0) +#define FB_CLEAR_DIS BIT(3) /* CPU Fill buffer clear disable */ #define MSR_IA32_SYSENTER_CS 0x00000174 #define MSR_IA32_SYSENTER_ESP 0x00000175 diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c index 4417b72ab065..eb2bfdc8c431 100644 --- a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.c @@ -226,6 +226,9 @@ static const struct { #define L1D_CACHE_ORDER 4 static void *vmx_l1d_flush_pages; +/* Control for disabling CPU Fill buffer clear */ +static bool __read_mostly vmx_fb_clear_ctrl_available; + static int vmx_setup_l1d_flush(enum vmx_l1d_flush_state l1tf) { struct page *page; @@ -357,6 +360,60 @@ static int vmentry_l1d_flush_get(char *s, const struct kernel_param *kp) return sprintf(s, "%s\n", vmentry_l1d_param[l1tf_vmx_mitigation].option); } +static void vmx_setup_fb_clear_ctrl(void) +{ + u64 msr; + + if (boot_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_ARCH_CAPABILITIES) && + !boot_cpu_has_bug(X86_BUG_MDS) && + !boot_cpu_has_bug(X86_BUG_TAA)) { + rdmsrl(MSR_IA32_ARCH_CAPABILITIES, msr); + if (msr & ARCH_CAP_FB_CLEAR_CTRL) + vmx_fb_clear_ctrl_available = true; + } +} + +static __always_inline void vmx_disable_fb_clear(struct vcpu_vmx *vmx) +{ + u64 msr; + + if (!vmx->disable_fb_clear) + return; + + rdmsrl(MSR_IA32_MCU_OPT_CTRL, msr); + msr |= FB_CLEAR_DIS; + wrmsrl(MSR_IA32_MCU_OPT_CTRL, msr); + /* Cache the MSR value to avoid reading it later */ + vmx->msr_ia32_mcu_opt_ctrl = msr; +} + +static __always_inline void vmx_enable_fb_clear(struct vcpu_vmx *vmx) +{ + if (!vmx->disable_fb_clear) + return; + + vmx->msr_ia32_mcu_opt_ctrl &= ~FB_CLEAR_DIS; + wrmsrl(MSR_IA32_MCU_OPT_CTRL, vmx->msr_ia32_mcu_opt_ctrl); +} + +static void vmx_update_fb_clear_dis(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct vcpu_vmx *vmx) +{ + vmx->disable_fb_clear = vmx_fb_clear_ctrl_available; + + /* + * If guest will not execute VERW, there is no need to set FB_CLEAR_DIS + * at VMEntry. Skip the MSR read/write when a guest has no use case to + * execute VERW. + */ + if ((vcpu->arch.arch_capabilities & ARCH_CAP_FB_CLEAR) || + ((vcpu->arch.arch_capabilities & ARCH_CAP_MDS_NO) && + (vcpu->arch.arch_capabilities & ARCH_CAP_TAA_NO) && + (vcpu->arch.arch_capabilities & ARCH_CAP_PSDP_NO) && + (vcpu->arch.arch_capabilities & ARCH_CAP_FBSDP_NO) && + (vcpu->arch.arch_capabilities & ARCH_CAP_SBDR_SSDP_NO))) + vmx->disable_fb_clear = false; +} + static const struct kernel_param_ops vmentry_l1d_flush_ops = { .set = vmentry_l1d_flush_set, .get = vmentry_l1d_flush_get, @@ -2211,6 +2268,10 @@ static int vmx_set_msr(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, struct msr_data *msr_info) ret = kvm_set_msr_common(vcpu, msr_info); } + /* FB_CLEAR may have changed, also update the FB_CLEAR_DIS behavior */ + if (msr_index == MSR_IA32_ARCH_CAPABILITIES) + vmx_update_fb_clear_dis(vcpu, vmx); + return ret; } @@ -4479,6 +4540,8 @@ static void vmx_vcpu_reset(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, bool init_event) vpid_sync_context(vmx->vpid); if (init_event) vmx_clear_hlt(vcpu); + + vmx_update_fb_clear_dis(vcpu, vmx); } static void enable_irq_window(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu) @@ -6629,6 +6692,8 @@ static noinstr void vmx_vcpu_enter_exit(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, kvm_arch_has_assigned_device(vcpu->kvm)) mds_clear_cpu_buffers(); + vmx_disable_fb_clear(vmx); + if (vcpu->arch.cr2 != native_read_cr2()) native_write_cr2(vcpu->arch.cr2); @@ -6637,6 +6702,8 @@ static noinstr void vmx_vcpu_enter_exit(struct kvm_vcpu *vcpu, vcpu->arch.cr2 = native_read_cr2(); + vmx_enable_fb_clear(vmx); + /* * VMEXIT disables interrupts (host state), but tracing and lockdep * have them in state 'on' as recorded before entering guest mode. @@ -8020,6 +8087,8 @@ static int __init vmx_init(void) return r; } + vmx_setup_fb_clear_ctrl(); + for_each_possible_cpu(cpu) { INIT_LIST_HEAD(&per_cpu(loaded_vmcss_on_cpu, cpu)); diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.h b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.h index 5ff24537393e..31317c8915e4 100644 --- a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.h +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmx.h @@ -300,6 +300,8 @@ struct vcpu_vmx { u64 msr_ia32_feature_control; u64 msr_ia32_feature_control_valid_bits; u64 ept_pointer; + u64 msr_ia32_mcu_opt_ctrl; + bool disable_fb_clear; struct pt_desc pt_desc; diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c index b885063dc393..26b51a6dc376 100644 --- a/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/x86.c @@ -1415,6 +1415,9 @@ static u64 kvm_get_arch_capabilities(void) */ } + /* Guests don't need to know "Fill buffer clear control" exists */ + data &= ~ARCH_CAP_FB_CLEAR_CTRL; + return data; } diff --git a/tools/arch/x86/include/asm/msr-index.h b/tools/arch/x86/include/asm/msr-index.h index 37a7b1ec1ac0..96973d197972 100644 --- a/tools/arch/x86/include/asm/msr-index.h +++ b/tools/arch/x86/include/asm/msr-index.h @@ -133,6 +133,11 @@ * VERW clears CPU fill buffer * even on MDS_NO CPUs. */ +#define ARCH_CAP_FB_CLEAR_CTRL BIT(18) /* + * MSR_IA32_MCU_OPT_CTRL[FB_CLEAR_DIS] + * bit available to control VERW + * behavior. + */ #define MSR_IA32_FLUSH_CMD 0x0000010b #define L1D_FLUSH BIT(0) /* @@ -150,6 +155,7 @@ /* SRBDS support */ #define MSR_IA32_MCU_OPT_CTRL 0x00000123 #define RNGDS_MITG_DIS BIT(0) +#define FB_CLEAR_DIS BIT(3) /* CPU Fill buffer clear disable */ #define MSR_IA32_SYSENTER_CS 0x00000174 #define MSR_IA32_SYSENTER_ESP 0x00000175 -- Gitee