From 50832d72b32f27477fc20fb25c804dec0f9731e6 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Daniel Sneddon Date: Tue, 2 Aug 2022 15:47:01 -0700 Subject: [PATCH 1/2] x86/speculation: Add RSB VM Exit protections stable inclusion from stable-5.10.136 commit 509c2c9fe75ea7493eebbb6bb2f711f37530ae19 category: bugfix issue: I5OHYL CVE: CVE-2022-26373 Signed-off-by: gaochao --------------------------------------- commit 2b1299322016731d56807aa49254a5ea3080b6b3 upstream. tl;dr: The Enhanced IBRS mitigation for Spectre v2 does not work as documented for RET instructions after VM exits. Mitigate it with a new one-entry RSB stuffing mechanism and a new LFENCE. == Background == Indirect Branch Restricted Speculation (IBRS) was designed to help mitigate Branch Target Injection and Speculative Store Bypass, i.e. Spectre, attacks. IBRS prevents software run in less privileged modes from affecting branch prediction in more privileged modes. IBRS requires the MSR to be written on every privilege level change. To overcome some of the performance issues of IBRS, Enhanced IBRS was introduced. eIBRS is an "always on" IBRS, in other words, just turn it on once instead of writing the MSR on every privilege level change. When eIBRS is enabled, more privileged modes should be protected from less privileged modes, including protecting VMMs from guests. == Problem == Here's a simplification of how guests are run on Linux' KVM: void run_kvm_guest(void) { // Prepare to run guest VMRESUME(); // Clean up after guest runs } The execution flow for that would look something like this to the processor: 1. Host-side: call run_kvm_guest() 2. Host-side: VMRESUME 3. Guest runs, does "CALL guest_function" 4. VM exit, host runs again 5. Host might make some "cleanup" function calls 6. Host-side: RET from run_kvm_guest() Now, when back on the host, there are a couple of possible scenarios of post-guest activity the host needs to do before executing host code: * on pre-eIBRS hardware (legacy IBRS, or nothing at all), the RSB is not touched and Linux has to do a 32-entry stuffing. * on eIBRS hardware, VM exit with IBRS enabled, or restoring the host IBRS=1 shortly after VM exit, has a documented side effect of flushing the RSB except in this PBRSB situation where the software needs to stuff the last RSB entry "by hand". IOW, with eIBRS supported, host RET instructions should no longer be influenced by guest behavior after the host retires a single CALL instruction. However, if the RET instructions are "unbalanced" with CALLs after a VM exit as is the RET in #6, it might speculatively use the address for the instruction after the CALL in #3 as an RSB prediction. This is a problem since the (untrusted) guest controls this address. Balanced CALL/RET instruction pairs such as in step #5 are not affected. == Solution == The PBRSB issue affects a wide variety of Intel processors which support eIBRS. But not all of them need mitigation. Today, X86_FEATURE_RSB_VMEXIT triggers an RSB filling sequence that mitigates PBRSB. Systems setting RSB_VMEXIT need no further mitigation - i.e., eIBRS systems which enable legacy IBRS explicitly. However, such systems (X86_FEATURE_IBRS_ENHANCED) do not set RSB_VMEXIT and most of them need a new mitigation. Therefore, introduce a new feature flag X86_FEATURE_RSB_VMEXIT_LITE which triggers a lighter-weight PBRSB mitigation versus RSB_VMEXIT. The lighter-weight mitigation performs a CALL instruction which is immediately followed by a speculative execution barrier (INT3). This steers speculative execution to the barrier -- just like a retpoline -- which ensures that speculation can never reach an unbalanced RET. Then, ensure this CALL is retired before continuing execution with an LFENCE. In other words, the window of exposure is opened at VM exit where RET behavior is troublesome. While the window is open, force RSB predictions sampling for RET targets to a dead end at the INT3. Close the window with the LFENCE. There is a subset of eIBRS systems which are not vulnerable to PBRSB. Add these systems to the cpu_vuln_whitelist[] as NO_EIBRS_PBRSB. Future systems that aren't vulnerable will set ARCH_CAP_PBRSB_NO. [ bp: Massage, incorporate review comments from Andy Cooper. ] Signed-off-by: Daniel Sneddon Co-developed-by: Pawan Gupta Signed-off-by: Pawan Gupta Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman --- Documentation/admin-guide/hw-vuln/spectre.rst | 8 ++ arch/x86/include/asm/cpufeatures.h | 2 + arch/x86/include/asm/msr-index.h | 4 + arch/x86/include/asm/nospec-branch.h | 17 +++- arch/x86/kernel/cpu/bugs.c | 86 ++++++++++++++----- arch/x86/kernel/cpu/common.c | 12 ++- arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmenter.S | 8 +- tools/arch/x86/include/asm/cpufeatures.h | 1 + tools/arch/x86/include/asm/msr-index.h | 4 + 9 files changed, 113 insertions(+), 29 deletions(-) diff --git a/Documentation/admin-guide/hw-vuln/spectre.rst b/Documentation/admin-guide/hw-vuln/spectre.rst index 3a6e1fcad3c0..a4cb79d0dd57 100644 --- a/Documentation/admin-guide/hw-vuln/spectre.rst +++ b/Documentation/admin-guide/hw-vuln/spectre.rst @@ -422,6 +422,14 @@ The possible values in this file are: 'RSB filling' Protection of RSB on context switch enabled ============= =========================================== + - EIBRS Post-barrier Return Stack Buffer (PBRSB) protection status: + + =========================== ======================================================= + 'PBRSB-eIBRS: SW sequence' CPU is affected and protection of RSB on VMEXIT enabled + 'PBRSB-eIBRS: Vulnerable' CPU is vulnerable + 'PBRSB-eIBRS: Not affected' CPU is not affected by PBRSB + =========================== ======================================================= + Full mitigation might require a microcode update from the CPU vendor. When the necessary microcode is not available, the kernel will report vulnerability. diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/cpufeatures.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/cpufeatures.h index e077f4fe7c6d..3c7db4732ed5 100644 --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/cpufeatures.h +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/cpufeatures.h @@ -298,6 +298,7 @@ #define X86_FEATURE_RETPOLINE_LFENCE (11*32+13) /* "" Use LFENCE for Spectre variant 2 */ #define X86_FEATURE_RETHUNK (11*32+14) /* "" Use REturn THUNK */ #define X86_FEATURE_UNRET (11*32+15) /* "" AMD BTB untrain return */ +#define X86_FEATURE_RSB_VMEXIT_LITE (11*32+17) /* "" Fill RSB on VM exit when EIBRS is enabled */ /* Intel-defined CPU features, CPUID level 0x00000007:1 (EAX), word 12 */ #define X86_FEATURE_AVX512_BF16 (12*32+ 5) /* AVX512 BFLOAT16 instructions */ @@ -428,5 +429,6 @@ #define X86_BUG_SRBDS X86_BUG(24) /* CPU may leak RNG bits if not mitigated */ #define X86_BUG_MMIO_STALE_DATA X86_BUG(25) /* CPU is affected by Processor MMIO Stale Data vulnerabilities */ #define X86_BUG_RETBLEED X86_BUG(26) /* CPU is affected by RETBleed */ +#define X86_BUG_EIBRS_PBRSB X86_BUG(27) /* EIBRS is vulnerable to Post Barrier RSB Predictions */ #endif /* _ASM_X86_CPUFEATURES_H */ diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/msr-index.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/msr-index.h index 407de670cd60..144dc164b759 100644 --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/msr-index.h +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/msr-index.h @@ -148,6 +148,10 @@ * are restricted to targets in * kernel. */ +#define ARCH_CAP_PBRSB_NO BIT(24) /* + * Not susceptible to Post-Barrier + * Return Stack Buffer Predictions. + */ #define MSR_IA32_FLUSH_CMD 0x0000010b #define L1D_FLUSH BIT(0) /* diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/nospec-branch.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/nospec-branch.h index 6f2adaf53f46..f9a5c02dc9e6 100644 --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/nospec-branch.h +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/nospec-branch.h @@ -118,13 +118,28 @@ #endif .endm +.macro ISSUE_UNBALANCED_RET_GUARD + ANNOTATE_INTRA_FUNCTION_CALL + call .Lunbalanced_ret_guard_\@ + int3 +.Lunbalanced_ret_guard_\@: + add $(BITS_PER_LONG/8), %_ASM_SP + lfence +.endm + /* * A simpler FILL_RETURN_BUFFER macro. Don't make people use the CPP * monstrosity above, manually. */ -.macro FILL_RETURN_BUFFER reg:req nr:req ftr:req +.macro FILL_RETURN_BUFFER reg:req nr:req ftr:req ftr2 +.ifb \ftr2 ALTERNATIVE "jmp .Lskip_rsb_\@", "", \ftr +.else + ALTERNATIVE_2 "jmp .Lskip_rsb_\@", "", \ftr, "jmp .Lunbalanced_\@", \ftr2 +.endif __FILL_RETURN_BUFFER(\reg,\nr,%_ASM_SP) +.Lunbalanced_\@: + ISSUE_UNBALANCED_RET_GUARD .Lskip_rsb_\@: .endm diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/bugs.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/bugs.c index bc6382f5ec27..d4cb9ff639aa 100644 --- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/bugs.c +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/bugs.c @@ -1290,6 +1290,53 @@ static void __init spec_ctrl_disable_kernel_rrsba(void) } } +static void __init spectre_v2_determine_rsb_fill_type_at_vmexit(enum spectre_v2_mitigation mode) +{ + /* + * Similar to context switches, there are two types of RSB attacks + * after VM exit: + * + * 1) RSB underflow + * + * 2) Poisoned RSB entry + * + * When retpoline is enabled, both are mitigated by filling/clearing + * the RSB. + * + * When IBRS is enabled, while #1 would be mitigated by the IBRS branch + * prediction isolation protections, RSB still needs to be cleared + * because of #2. Note that SMEP provides no protection here, unlike + * user-space-poisoned RSB entries. + * + * eIBRS should protect against RSB poisoning, but if the EIBRS_PBRSB + * bug is present then a LITE version of RSB protection is required, + * just a single call needs to retire before a RET is executed. + */ + switch (mode) { + case SPECTRE_V2_NONE: + return; + + case SPECTRE_V2_EIBRS_LFENCE: + case SPECTRE_V2_EIBRS: + if (boot_cpu_has_bug(X86_BUG_EIBRS_PBRSB)) { + setup_force_cpu_cap(X86_FEATURE_RSB_VMEXIT_LITE); + pr_info("Spectre v2 / PBRSB-eIBRS: Retire a single CALL on VMEXIT\n"); + } + return; + + case SPECTRE_V2_EIBRS_RETPOLINE: + case SPECTRE_V2_RETPOLINE: + case SPECTRE_V2_LFENCE: + case SPECTRE_V2_IBRS: + setup_force_cpu_cap(X86_FEATURE_RSB_VMEXIT); + pr_info("Spectre v2 / SpectreRSB : Filling RSB on VMEXIT\n"); + return; + } + + pr_warn_once("Unknown Spectre v2 mode, disabling RSB mitigation at VM exit"); + dump_stack(); +} + static void __init spectre_v2_select_mitigation(void) { enum spectre_v2_mitigation_cmd cmd = spectre_v2_parse_cmdline(); @@ -1438,28 +1485,7 @@ static void __init spectre_v2_select_mitigation(void) setup_force_cpu_cap(X86_FEATURE_RSB_CTXSW); pr_info("Spectre v2 / SpectreRSB mitigation: Filling RSB on context switch\n"); - /* - * Similar to context switches, there are two types of RSB attacks - * after vmexit: - * - * 1) RSB underflow - * - * 2) Poisoned RSB entry - * - * When retpoline is enabled, both are mitigated by filling/clearing - * the RSB. - * - * When IBRS is enabled, while #1 would be mitigated by the IBRS branch - * prediction isolation protections, RSB still needs to be cleared - * because of #2. Note that SMEP provides no protection here, unlike - * user-space-poisoned RSB entries. - * - * eIBRS, on the other hand, has RSB-poisoning protections, so it - * doesn't need RSB clearing after vmexit. - */ - if (boot_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_RETPOLINE) || - boot_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_KERNEL_IBRS)) - setup_force_cpu_cap(X86_FEATURE_RSB_VMEXIT); + spectre_v2_determine_rsb_fill_type_at_vmexit(mode); /* * Retpoline protects the kernel, but doesn't protect firmware. IBRS @@ -2202,6 +2228,19 @@ static char *ibpb_state(void) return ""; } +static char *pbrsb_eibrs_state(void) +{ + if (boot_cpu_has_bug(X86_BUG_EIBRS_PBRSB)) { + if (boot_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_RSB_VMEXIT_LITE) || + boot_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_RSB_VMEXIT)) + return ", PBRSB-eIBRS: SW sequence"; + else + return ", PBRSB-eIBRS: Vulnerable"; + } else { + return ", PBRSB-eIBRS: Not affected"; + } +} + static ssize_t spectre_v2_show_state(char *buf) { if (spectre_v2_enabled == SPECTRE_V2_LFENCE) @@ -2214,12 +2253,13 @@ static ssize_t spectre_v2_show_state(char *buf) spectre_v2_enabled == SPECTRE_V2_EIBRS_LFENCE) return sprintf(buf, "Vulnerable: eIBRS+LFENCE with unprivileged eBPF and SMT\n"); - return sprintf(buf, "%s%s%s%s%s%s\n", + return sprintf(buf, "%s%s%s%s%s%s%s\n", spectre_v2_strings[spectre_v2_enabled], ibpb_state(), boot_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_USE_IBRS_FW) ? ", IBRS_FW" : "", stibp_state(), boot_cpu_has(X86_FEATURE_RSB_CTXSW) ? ", RSB filling" : "", + pbrsb_eibrs_state(), spectre_v2_module_string()); } diff --git a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/common.c b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/common.c index 58ef0bb725a5..a761197965de 100644 --- a/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/common.c +++ b/arch/x86/kernel/cpu/common.c @@ -1024,6 +1024,7 @@ static void identify_cpu_without_cpuid(struct cpuinfo_x86 *c) #define NO_SWAPGS BIT(6) #define NO_ITLB_MULTIHIT BIT(7) #define NO_SPECTRE_V2 BIT(8) +#define NO_EIBRS_PBRSB BIT(9) #define VULNWL(vendor, family, model, whitelist) \ X86_MATCH_VENDOR_FAM_MODEL(vendor, family, model, whitelist) @@ -1064,7 +1065,7 @@ static const __initconst struct x86_cpu_id cpu_vuln_whitelist[] = { VULNWL_INTEL(ATOM_GOLDMONT, NO_MDS | NO_L1TF | NO_SWAPGS | NO_ITLB_MULTIHIT), VULNWL_INTEL(ATOM_GOLDMONT_D, NO_MDS | NO_L1TF | NO_SWAPGS | NO_ITLB_MULTIHIT), - VULNWL_INTEL(ATOM_GOLDMONT_PLUS, NO_MDS | NO_L1TF | NO_SWAPGS | NO_ITLB_MULTIHIT), + VULNWL_INTEL(ATOM_GOLDMONT_PLUS, NO_MDS | NO_L1TF | NO_SWAPGS | NO_ITLB_MULTIHIT | NO_EIBRS_PBRSB), /* * Technically, swapgs isn't serializing on AMD (despite it previously @@ -1074,7 +1075,9 @@ static const __initconst struct x86_cpu_id cpu_vuln_whitelist[] = { * good enough for our purposes. */ - VULNWL_INTEL(ATOM_TREMONT_D, NO_ITLB_MULTIHIT), + VULNWL_INTEL(ATOM_TREMONT, NO_EIBRS_PBRSB), + VULNWL_INTEL(ATOM_TREMONT_L, NO_EIBRS_PBRSB), + VULNWL_INTEL(ATOM_TREMONT_D, NO_ITLB_MULTIHIT | NO_EIBRS_PBRSB), /* AMD Family 0xf - 0x12 */ VULNWL_AMD(0x0f, NO_MELTDOWN | NO_SSB | NO_L1TF | NO_MDS | NO_SWAPGS | NO_ITLB_MULTIHIT), @@ -1252,6 +1255,11 @@ static void __init cpu_set_bug_bits(struct cpuinfo_x86 *c) setup_force_cpu_bug(X86_BUG_RETBLEED); } + if (cpu_has(c, X86_FEATURE_IBRS_ENHANCED) && + !cpu_matches(cpu_vuln_whitelist, NO_EIBRS_PBRSB) && + !(ia32_cap & ARCH_CAP_PBRSB_NO)) + setup_force_cpu_bug(X86_BUG_EIBRS_PBRSB); + if (cpu_matches(cpu_vuln_whitelist, NO_MELTDOWN)) return; diff --git a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmenter.S b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmenter.S index 857fa0fc49fa..982138bebb70 100644 --- a/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmenter.S +++ b/arch/x86/kvm/vmx/vmenter.S @@ -197,11 +197,13 @@ SYM_INNER_LABEL(vmx_vmexit, SYM_L_GLOBAL) * entries and (in some cases) RSB underflow. * * eIBRS has its own protection against poisoned RSB, so it doesn't - * need the RSB filling sequence. But it does need to be enabled - * before the first unbalanced RET. + * need the RSB filling sequence. But it does need to be enabled, and a + * single call to retire, before the first unbalanced RET. */ - FILL_RETURN_BUFFER %_ASM_CX, RSB_CLEAR_LOOPS, X86_FEATURE_RSB_VMEXIT + FILL_RETURN_BUFFER %_ASM_CX, RSB_CLEAR_LOOPS, X86_FEATURE_RSB_VMEXIT,\ + X86_FEATURE_RSB_VMEXIT_LITE + pop %_ASM_ARG2 /* @flags */ pop %_ASM_ARG1 /* @vmx */ diff --git a/tools/arch/x86/include/asm/cpufeatures.h b/tools/arch/x86/include/asm/cpufeatures.h index 54ba20492ad1..ec53f52a06a5 100644 --- a/tools/arch/x86/include/asm/cpufeatures.h +++ b/tools/arch/x86/include/asm/cpufeatures.h @@ -296,6 +296,7 @@ #define X86_FEATURE_RETPOLINE_LFENCE (11*32+13) /* "" Use LFENCE for Spectre variant 2 */ #define X86_FEATURE_RETHUNK (11*32+14) /* "" Use REturn THUNK */ #define X86_FEATURE_UNRET (11*32+15) /* "" AMD BTB untrain return */ +#define X86_FEATURE_RSB_VMEXIT_LITE (11*32+17) /* "" Fill RSB on VM-Exit when EIBRS is enabled */ /* Intel-defined CPU features, CPUID level 0x00000007:1 (EAX), word 12 */ #define X86_FEATURE_AVX512_BF16 (12*32+ 5) /* AVX512 BFLOAT16 instructions */ diff --git a/tools/arch/x86/include/asm/msr-index.h b/tools/arch/x86/include/asm/msr-index.h index 407de670cd60..144dc164b759 100644 --- a/tools/arch/x86/include/asm/msr-index.h +++ b/tools/arch/x86/include/asm/msr-index.h @@ -148,6 +148,10 @@ * are restricted to targets in * kernel. */ +#define ARCH_CAP_PBRSB_NO BIT(24) /* + * Not susceptible to Post-Barrier + * Return Stack Buffer Predictions. + */ #define MSR_IA32_FLUSH_CMD 0x0000010b #define L1D_FLUSH BIT(0) /* -- Gitee From e19fa87f2d0dfa9ba7dc0bd792d8a6b1b191eb30 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Pawan Gupta Date: Tue, 2 Aug 2022 15:47:02 -0700 Subject: [PATCH 2/2] x86/speculation: Add LFENCE to RSB fill sequence stable inclusion from stable-5.10.136 commit 1bea03b44ea2267988cce064f5887b01d421b28c category: bugfix issue: I5OHYL CVE: CVE-2022-26373 Signed-off-by: gaochao --------------------------------------- commit ba6e31af2be96c4d0536f2152ed6f7b6c11bca47 upstream. RSB fill sequence does not have any protection for miss-prediction of conditional branch at the end of the sequence. CPU can speculatively execute code immediately after the sequence, while RSB filling hasn't completed yet. #define __FILL_RETURN_BUFFER(reg, nr, sp) \ mov $(nr/2), reg; \ 771: \ ANNOTATE_INTRA_FUNCTION_CALL; \ call 772f; \ 773: /* speculation trap */ \ UNWIND_HINT_EMPTY; \ pause; \ lfence; \ jmp 773b; \ 772: \ ANNOTATE_INTRA_FUNCTION_CALL; \ call 774f; \ 775: /* speculation trap */ \ UNWIND_HINT_EMPTY; \ pause; \ lfence; \ jmp 775b; \ 774: \ add $(BITS_PER_LONG/8) * 2, sp; \ dec reg; \ jnz 771b; <----- CPU can miss-predict here. Before RSB is filled, RETs that come in program order after this macro can be executed speculatively, making them vulnerable to RSB-based attacks. Mitigate it by adding an LFENCE after the conditional branch to prevent speculation while RSB is being filled. Suggested-by: Andrew Cooper Signed-off-by: Pawan Gupta Signed-off-by: Borislav Petkov Signed-off-by: Daniel Sneddon Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman --- arch/x86/include/asm/nospec-branch.h | 4 +++- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) diff --git a/arch/x86/include/asm/nospec-branch.h b/arch/x86/include/asm/nospec-branch.h index f9a5c02dc9e6..108db637fdd4 100644 --- a/arch/x86/include/asm/nospec-branch.h +++ b/arch/x86/include/asm/nospec-branch.h @@ -60,7 +60,9 @@ 774: \ add $(BITS_PER_LONG/8) * 2, sp; \ dec reg; \ - jnz 771b; + jnz 771b; \ + /* barrier for jnz misprediction */ \ + lfence; #ifdef __ASSEMBLY__ -- Gitee