From 7ff278cb7447fbfd4a1c32814c97b6e426845716 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: yexiao Date: Thu, 25 Jan 2024 00:31:31 +0800 Subject: [PATCH] Fix some CVE MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Fix CVE-2023-0464、CVE-2023-0465、CVE-2023-0466 CVE-2023-2650、CVE-2023-3446、CVE-2023-3817、 CVE-2024-0727 Signed-off-by: yexiao --- ...esource-use-verifying-policy-constra.patch | 225 ++++++++++++++++++ edk2.spec | 6 +- 2 files changed, 230 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-) create mode 100644 0045-x509-excessive-resource-use-verifying-policy-constra.patch diff --git a/0045-x509-excessive-resource-use-verifying-policy-constra.patch b/0045-x509-excessive-resource-use-verifying-policy-constra.patch new file mode 100644 index 0000000..054be46 --- /dev/null +++ b/0045-x509-excessive-resource-use-verifying-policy-constra.patch @@ -0,0 +1,225 @@ +From 6ca0630d28a052c22bcca15019fb35253e6bceed Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 +From: Pauli +Date: Wed, 8 Mar 2023 15:28:20 +1100 +Subject: [PATCH 01/11] x509: excessive resource use verifying policy + constraints + +A security vulnerability has been identified in all supported versions +of OpenSSL related to the verification of X.509 certificate chains +that include policy constraints. Attackers may be able to exploit this +vulnerability by creating a malicious certificate chain that triggers +exponential use of computational resources, leading to a denial-of-service +(DoS) attack on affected systems. + +Fixes CVE-2023-0464 + +Reviewed-by: Tomas Mraz +Reviewed-by: Shane Lontis + +reference: https://github.com/openssl/openssl/pull/20569 +Signed-off-by: yexiao +--- + .../openssl/crypto/x509v3/pcy_local.h | 8 +++- + .../openssl/crypto/x509v3/pcy_node.c | 12 ++++-- + .../openssl/crypto/x509v3/pcy_tree.c | 37 ++++++++++++++----- + 3 files changed, 43 insertions(+), 14 deletions(-) + +diff --git a/CryptoPkg/Library/OpensslLib/openssl/crypto/x509v3/pcy_local.h b/CryptoPkg/Library/OpensslLib/openssl/crypto/x509v3/pcy_local.h +index 5daf78d..344aa06 100644 +--- a/CryptoPkg/Library/OpensslLib/openssl/crypto/x509v3/pcy_local.h ++++ b/CryptoPkg/Library/OpensslLib/openssl/crypto/x509v3/pcy_local.h +@@ -111,6 +111,11 @@ struct X509_POLICY_LEVEL_st { + }; + + struct X509_POLICY_TREE_st { ++ /* The number of nodes in the tree */ ++ size_t node_count; ++ /* The maximum number of nodes in the tree */ ++ size_t node_maximum; ++ + /* This is the tree 'level' data */ + X509_POLICY_LEVEL *levels; + int nlevel; +@@ -159,7 +164,8 @@ X509_POLICY_NODE *tree_find_sk(STACK_OF(X509_POLICY_NODE) *sk, + X509_POLICY_NODE *level_add_node(X509_POLICY_LEVEL *level, + X509_POLICY_DATA *data, + X509_POLICY_NODE *parent, +- X509_POLICY_TREE *tree); ++ X509_POLICY_TREE *tree, ++ int extra_data); + void policy_node_free(X509_POLICY_NODE *node); + int policy_node_match(const X509_POLICY_LEVEL *lvl, + const X509_POLICY_NODE *node, const ASN1_OBJECT *oid); +diff --git a/CryptoPkg/Library/OpensslLib/openssl/crypto/x509v3/pcy_node.c b/CryptoPkg/Library/OpensslLib/openssl/crypto/x509v3/pcy_node.c +index e2d7b15..d574fb9 100644 +--- a/CryptoPkg/Library/OpensslLib/openssl/crypto/x509v3/pcy_node.c ++++ b/CryptoPkg/Library/OpensslLib/openssl/crypto/x509v3/pcy_node.c +@@ -59,10 +59,15 @@ X509_POLICY_NODE *level_find_node(const X509_POLICY_LEVEL *level, + X509_POLICY_NODE *level_add_node(X509_POLICY_LEVEL *level, + X509_POLICY_DATA *data, + X509_POLICY_NODE *parent, +- X509_POLICY_TREE *tree) ++ X509_POLICY_TREE *tree, ++ int extra_data) + { + X509_POLICY_NODE *node; + ++ /* Verify that the tree isn't too large. This mitigates CVE-2023-0464 */ ++ if (tree->node_maximum > 0 && tree->node_count >= tree->node_maximum) ++ return NULL; ++ + node = OPENSSL_zalloc(sizeof(*node)); + if (node == NULL) { + X509V3err(X509V3_F_LEVEL_ADD_NODE, ERR_R_MALLOC_FAILURE); +@@ -70,7 +75,7 @@ X509_POLICY_NODE *level_add_node(X509_POLICY_LEVEL *level, + } + node->data = data; + node->parent = parent; +- if (level) { ++ if (level != NULL) { + if (OBJ_obj2nid(data->valid_policy) == NID_any_policy) { + if (level->anyPolicy) + goto node_error; +@@ -90,7 +95,7 @@ X509_POLICY_NODE *level_add_node(X509_POLICY_LEVEL *level, + } + } + +- if (tree) { ++ if (extra_data) { + if (tree->extra_data == NULL) + tree->extra_data = sk_X509_POLICY_DATA_new_null(); + if (tree->extra_data == NULL){ +@@ -103,6 +108,7 @@ X509_POLICY_NODE *level_add_node(X509_POLICY_LEVEL *level, + } + } + ++ tree->node_count++; + if (parent) + parent->nchild++; + +diff --git a/CryptoPkg/Library/OpensslLib/openssl/crypto/x509v3/pcy_tree.c b/CryptoPkg/Library/OpensslLib/openssl/crypto/x509v3/pcy_tree.c +index 6e8322c..6c7fd35 100644 +--- a/CryptoPkg/Library/OpensslLib/openssl/crypto/x509v3/pcy_tree.c ++++ b/CryptoPkg/Library/OpensslLib/openssl/crypto/x509v3/pcy_tree.c +@@ -13,6 +13,18 @@ + + #include "pcy_local.h" + ++/* ++ * If the maximum number of nodes in the policy tree isn't defined, set it to ++ * a generous default of 1000 nodes. ++ * ++ * Defining this to be zero means unlimited policy tree growth which opens the ++ * door on CVE-2023-0464. ++ */ ++ ++#ifndef OPENSSL_POLICY_TREE_NODES_MAX ++# define OPENSSL_POLICY_TREE_NODES_MAX 1000 ++#endif ++ + /* + * Enable this to print out the complete policy tree at various point during + * evaluation. +@@ -168,6 +180,9 @@ static int tree_init(X509_POLICY_TREE **ptree, STACK_OF(X509) *certs, + return X509_PCY_TREE_INTERNAL; + } + ++ /* Limit the growth of the tree to mitigate CVE-2023-0464 */ ++ tree->node_maximum = OPENSSL_POLICY_TREE_NODES_MAX; ++ + /* + * http://tools.ietf.org/html/rfc5280#section-6.1.2, figure 3. + * +@@ -184,7 +199,7 @@ static int tree_init(X509_POLICY_TREE **ptree, STACK_OF(X509) *certs, + level = tree->levels; + if ((data = policy_data_new(NULL, OBJ_nid2obj(NID_any_policy), 0)) == NULL) + goto bad_tree; +- if (level_add_node(level, data, NULL, tree) == NULL) { ++ if (level_add_node(level, data, NULL, tree, 1) == NULL) { + policy_data_free(data); + goto bad_tree; + } +@@ -243,7 +258,8 @@ static int tree_init(X509_POLICY_TREE **ptree, STACK_OF(X509) *certs, + * Return value: 1 on success, 0 otherwise + */ + static int tree_link_matching_nodes(X509_POLICY_LEVEL *curr, +- X509_POLICY_DATA *data) ++ X509_POLICY_DATA *data, ++ X509_POLICY_TREE *tree) + { + X509_POLICY_LEVEL *last = curr - 1; + int i, matched = 0; +@@ -253,13 +269,13 @@ static int tree_link_matching_nodes(X509_POLICY_LEVEL *curr, + X509_POLICY_NODE *node = sk_X509_POLICY_NODE_value(last->nodes, i); + + if (policy_node_match(last, node, data->valid_policy)) { +- if (level_add_node(curr, data, node, NULL) == NULL) ++ if (level_add_node(curr, data, node, tree, 0) == NULL) + return 0; + matched = 1; + } + } + if (!matched && last->anyPolicy) { +- if (level_add_node(curr, data, last->anyPolicy, NULL) == NULL) ++ if (level_add_node(curr, data, last->anyPolicy, tree, 0) == NULL) + return 0; + } + return 1; +@@ -272,7 +288,8 @@ static int tree_link_matching_nodes(X509_POLICY_LEVEL *curr, + * Return value: 1 on success, 0 otherwise. + */ + static int tree_link_nodes(X509_POLICY_LEVEL *curr, +- const X509_POLICY_CACHE *cache) ++ const X509_POLICY_CACHE *cache, ++ X509_POLICY_TREE *tree) + { + int i; + +@@ -280,7 +297,7 @@ static int tree_link_nodes(X509_POLICY_LEVEL *curr, + X509_POLICY_DATA *data = sk_X509_POLICY_DATA_value(cache->data, i); + + /* Look for matching nodes in previous level */ +- if (!tree_link_matching_nodes(curr, data)) ++ if (!tree_link_matching_nodes(curr, data, tree)) + return 0; + } + return 1; +@@ -311,7 +328,7 @@ static int tree_add_unmatched(X509_POLICY_LEVEL *curr, + /* Curr may not have anyPolicy */ + data->qualifier_set = cache->anyPolicy->qualifier_set; + data->flags |= POLICY_DATA_FLAG_SHARED_QUALIFIERS; +- if (level_add_node(curr, data, node, tree) == NULL) { ++ if (level_add_node(curr, data, node, tree, 1) == NULL) { + policy_data_free(data); + return 0; + } +@@ -373,7 +390,7 @@ static int tree_link_any(X509_POLICY_LEVEL *curr, + } + /* Finally add link to anyPolicy */ + if (last->anyPolicy && +- level_add_node(curr, cache->anyPolicy, last->anyPolicy, NULL) == NULL) ++ level_add_node(curr, cache->anyPolicy, last->anyPolicy, tree, 0) == NULL) + return 0; + return 1; + } +@@ -555,7 +572,7 @@ static int tree_calculate_user_set(X509_POLICY_TREE *tree, + extra->qualifier_set = anyPolicy->data->qualifier_set; + extra->flags = POLICY_DATA_FLAG_SHARED_QUALIFIERS + | POLICY_DATA_FLAG_EXTRA_NODE; +- node = level_add_node(NULL, extra, anyPolicy->parent, tree); ++ node = level_add_node(NULL, extra, anyPolicy->parent, tree, 1); + } + if (!tree->user_policies) { + tree->user_policies = sk_X509_POLICY_NODE_new_null(); +@@ -582,7 +599,7 @@ static int tree_evaluate(X509_POLICY_TREE *tree) + + for (i = 1; i < tree->nlevel; i++, curr++) { + cache = policy_cache_set(curr->cert); +- if (!tree_link_nodes(curr, cache)) ++ if (!tree_link_nodes(curr, cache, tree)) + return X509_PCY_TREE_INTERNAL; + + if (!(curr->flags & X509_V_FLAG_INHIBIT_ANY) +-- +2.33.0 + diff --git a/edk2.spec b/edk2.spec index df6a519..2fe11ab 100644 --- a/edk2.spec +++ b/edk2.spec @@ -5,7 +5,7 @@ Name: edk2 Version: %{stable_date} -Release: 17 +Release: 18 Summary: EFI Development Kit II License: BSD-2-Clause-Patent URL: https://github.com/tianocore/edk2 @@ -58,6 +58,7 @@ Patch0043: 0041-Check-CMS-failure-during-BIO-setup-with-stream-is-ha.patch Patch0044: 0042-Correctly-compare-EdiPartyName-in-GENERAL_NAME_cmp.patch Patch0045: 0043-CVE-2023-0286-Fix-GENERAL_NAME_cmp-for-x400Address-1.patch Patch0046: 0044-Fix-Timing-Oracle-in-RSA-decryption.patch +Patch0047: 0045-x509-excessive-resource-use-verifying-policy-constra.patch BuildRequires: acpica-tools gcc gcc-c++ libuuid-devel python3 bc nasm python2 %description @@ -252,6 +253,9 @@ chmod +x %{buildroot}%{_bindir}/Rsa2048Sha256GenerateKeys %endif %changelog +* Tue Feb 20 2024 yexiao - 202002-18 +- fix CVE-2023-0464 + * Fri Jul 10 2023 yexiao - 202002-17 - fix Patch0046 -- Gitee