From d01fb9e3ce1df9858ede915d570977d382b71860 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: kuenking111 Date: Tue, 21 Dec 2021 14:41:24 +0800 Subject: [PATCH] I4NGWZ: delete stack protection --- openjdk-1.8.0.spec | 9 ++++++--- 1 file changed, 6 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-) diff --git a/openjdk-1.8.0.spec b/openjdk-1.8.0.spec index cfda2a4..ee40fb0 100644 --- a/openjdk-1.8.0.spec +++ b/openjdk-1.8.0.spec @@ -916,7 +916,7 @@ Provides: java-%{javaver}-%{origin}-accessibility%{?1} = %{epoch}:%{version}-%{r Name: java-%{javaver}-%{origin} Version: %{javaver}.%{updatever}.%{buildver} -Release: 9 +Release: 10 # java-1.5.0-ibm from jpackage.org set Epoch to 1 for unknown reasons # and this change was brought into RHEL-4. java-1.5.0-ibm packages # also included the epoch in their virtual provides. This created a @@ -1673,10 +1673,10 @@ export ARCH_DATA_MODEL=64 # We use ourcppflags because the OpenJDK build seems to # pass EXTRA_CFLAGS to the HotSpot C++ compiler... -EXTRA_CFLAGS="%ourcppflags -Wno-error -fcommon -fsigned-char -fstack-protector-all" +EXTRA_CFLAGS="%ourcppflags -Wno-error -fcommon -fsigned-char" EXTRA_CPP_FLAGS="%ourcppflags -Wno-error" -EXTRA_ASFLAGS="${EXTRA_CFLAGS} -Wa,--generate-missing-build-notes=yes -fstack-protector-all" +EXTRA_ASFLAGS="${EXTRA_CFLAGS} -Wa,--generate-missing-build-notes=yes" export EXTRA_CFLAGS EXTRA_ASFLAGS for suffix in %{build_loop} ; do @@ -2217,6 +2217,9 @@ require "copy_jdk_configs.lua" %endif %changelog +* Tue Dec 21 2021 kuenking111 - 1:1.8.0.312-b07.10 +- delete stack protection + * Mon Dec 20 2021 kuenking111 - 1:1.8.0.312-b07.9 - add downgrade-the-symver-of-fcntl64.patch -- Gitee